MN Gov Body
- Filters
- MN
- Mower County
- 12/10/24
- 12/11/2024
- 14 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Austin Planning Commission approved a variance request allowing Scott Soderberg to maintain additional accessory structures on his half-acre residential property. The approval is contingent on obtaining the neighboring property’s consent for a reduced setback on one of the structures. The decision will now be forwarded to the city council for final approval.
- MN
- Mower County
- 10/15/24
- 10/15/2024
- 17 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Austin Planning Commission held a public hearing to discuss a petition from Mill on Main 2 LLC seeking a variance to reduce the off-street parking requirement for a proposed apartment development. The Commission voted to recommend the approval of this variance to the City Council, allowing the development to provide 1.21 parking spaces per unit instead of the 1.5 spaces currently required by city code.
- MN
- Mower County
- 9/10/24
- 09/10/2024
- 10 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Austin Planning Commission has decided to delay its decision on a request for a conditional use permit for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) north of the city until October 15th.
- MN
- Mower County
- 8/14/24
- 08/14/2024
- 137 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Austin Planning and Zoning Commission held a meeting on August 14, 2024, where discussions included the approval of an appeal for a fence setback and a detailed examination of a proposed 12-lot planned unit development. The commission approved the fence setback appeal contingent on utility easement considerations and postponed a decision on the larger development project to gather more information.
- MN
- Mower County
- 7/9/24
- 07/09/2024
- 21 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Austin Planning Commission recommended approval for a fence appeal at a corner lot residence and supported a sign variance for a local business. Both decisions aim to address privacy, safety, and business visibility concerns in rapidly developing areas, with final decisions resting with the city council.
