MN Gov Body
- Filters
- MN
- Anoka County
- 6/24/25
- 06/24/2025
- 77 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The East Bethel Planning Commission meeting focused on discussions surrounding potential zoning ordinance amendments to accommodate barnaminiums and addressed multiple variance requests for development monument signs and residential setbacks. These topics have implications for future residential and commercial development in the area and reflect ongoing efforts to balance growth with community standards.
- MN
- Anoka County
- 3/25/25
- 03/26/2025
- 48 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The East Bethel Planning Commission meeting centered on discussions regarding the site plan and conditional use permit for a new building by Classic Construction on Ulissi Street, raising debate over the adequacy of screening for loading docks. The meeting also addressed the appointment of an interim fire chief and updates on local ordinances.
- MN
- Anoka County
- 2/25/25
- 02/25/2025
- 61 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The East Bethel Planning Commission’s recent meeting tackled several issues, including a much-debated variance request for a second driveway on a residential property and a rezoning proposal that could affect the city’s agricultural landscape. These topics sparked discussions among commission members and attendees.
- MN
- Anoka County
- 12/17/24
- 12/17/2024
- 97 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In the latest East Bethel Planning Commission meeting, the discussion focused primarily on the proposed regulations for cannabis businesses as the city prepares for the anticipated state rollout of licenses. With recreational marijuana now legal in Minnesota, East Bethel is crafting local ordinances to manage cannabis and hemp businesses.
- MN
- Anoka County
- 11/26/24
- 11/26/2024
- 55 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent East Bethel Planning Commission meeting, discussions were held on variance requests for a reduced setback for a patio and a second driveway access for two separate properties. Both applications generated considerable debate.
