NJ Gov Body
- Filters
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 6/9/25
- 06/09/2025
- 98 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a contentious Cranbury Township Committee meeting, residents voiced strong opposition to potential land seizures and affordable housing developments, with particular focus on the Henry family farm. Concerns ranged from eminent domain and property rights to the implications of affordable housing mandates on local land use.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 5/27/25
- 05/27/2025
- 38 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Cranbury Township Committee meeting on May 27th was marked by discussions about affordable housing and community engagement. Residents voiced their concerns over the perceived lack of transparency in decision-making processes and the township’s development plans. The committee also addressed safety issues in local parks and ongoing efforts to maintain environmental sustainability.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 5/12/25
- 05/12/2025
- 100 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Township Committee meeting on May 12, 2025, honed in on a series of contentious issues, with affordable housing plans and the acquisition of farmland taking center stage. Residents expressed strong concerns about transparency and the potential use of eminent domain, while township officials emphasized compliance with state mandates and community integration efforts.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 4/14/25
- 04/14/2025
- 80 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Township Committee meeting on April 14, 2025, addressed several issues, including police department operations, the donation of a sculpture by the Helen Cody Foundation, and community engagement strategies.
- NJ
- Middlesex County
- 3/24/25
- 03/24/2025
- 54 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Cranbury Township Committee meeting brought the historic Dancer House on Plainsboro Road into sharp focus, as tensions rose over its potential demolition or neglect. Members of the Cranbury Historical and Preservation Society, led by Mark Bowski, voiced their concerns during the public comment section, emphasizing the house’s historical significance and the society’s long-standing commitment to preservation efforts. Despite previous attempts to address the issue in October and March, the society felt sidelined as their request to discuss the matter at the meeting was denied, citing their non-township entity status. The committee now faces pressure to respect the historic preservation easement and engage in meaningful dialogue with preservationists to prevent any irreversible decisions.
