- NJ
- Union County
- 6/20/24
- 06/21/2024
- 79 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Roselle Park Borough Council meeting, members voted against reallocating funds initially intended for a Rick Barry statue, sparking a discussion on potential alternative uses for the money. The council also adopted a storm water control ordinance and engaged with public concerns regarding transparency and fiscal management.
- NJ
- Union County
- 6/6/24
- 06/07/2024
- 140 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a tense Roselle Park Borough Council meeting, residents voiced concerns over a recent 200% sewer rate increase and the management of cannabis dispensaries.
- NJ
- Union County
- 5/16/24
- 05/16/2024
- 184 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During a recent Roselle Park Borough Council meeting, the topic that dominated the conversation was the potential opening of three marijuana dispensaries in the town, with community members expressing concerns about the impact on local families and the town’s atmosphere. The council also discussed a significant 11-year payment plan with the city of Elizabeth regarding sewer issues and the distribution of tax revenue from the First Development project.
- NJ
- Union County
- 5/2/24
- 05/03/2024
- 81 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent Roselle Park Borough Council meeting, the proposed allocation of $150,000 for a statue of basketball player Rick Barry became a focal point of debate. This discussion arose amidst broader conversations about the 2024 Municipal budget, which included concerns about bond increases, surplus usage, and employee insurance costs.
- NJ
- Union County
- 4/18/24
- 04/18/2024
- 94 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: Roselle Park Borough Council’s recent meeting was marked by debate over the proposed dispensary in a residential area, which dominated the public comments section. Residents voiced strong objections, emphasizing potential adverse effects on traffic, children’s safety, and the overall community. The council members who defended the decision highlighted appropriate zoning and comparisons to other retail businesses. The council also tackled various other issues, including the introduction of traffic ordinance amendments, the allocation of funds for various improvement projects, and updates on community events and infrastructure improvements.