15:05A major focus of the meeting revolved around the difficulties posed by current Title 5 regulations, especially concerning the inspection of septic tanks. Board members debated the interpretation of “empty” in the context of septic inspections, expressing concerns about whether tanks must be completely pumped or simply accessible enough for inspection. It was noted that older tanks often reveal signs of failure, like spalling concrete, which can be identified if the tank is adequately accessible. Liability issues arose as homeowners might resist inspections that risk damaging their tanks. One suggestion was made to replace tanks if homeowners refuse to expose the outlet side, thereby circumventing inspection challenges and potential conflicts.

31:10The requirement for licensed soil evaluators to determine high water table levels was also reviewed, with a proposal to remove the ten-year constraint on soil evaluations. This suggestion found support, emphasizing the importance of professional evaluations regardless of when they were conducted. Discussion also touched upon septic systems’ performance, considering whether to adjust the requirement for a 36-inch separation between the system’s bottom and the high groundwater table. Comparisons to Connecticut’s code were mentioned as a potential reference point.

40:23The Board also scrutinized the standards for septic systems, particularly those that are undersized. A proposal to mandate the replacement of systems if their capacity is less than 60% of the design standard was met with debate. Participants stressed the importance of ensuring systems are not improperly approved and highlighted the need for accurate assessments by engineers regarding soil conditions and loading factors.

08:25The conversation included a review of existing septic tank regulations, raising questions about the practicality of longstanding rules. This included the distance requirement between septic tanks and wells, initially set at 100 feet due to historical contamination incidents. The Board debated the potential adoption of a 50-foot requirement, aligning with state guidelines, to balance health standards with property owners’ concerns.

In parallel, the Board acknowledged the prevalence of older systems in the town, with estimates suggesting around 20% have not been upgraded since 1995. Emphasis was placed on the importance of soil quality assessments and the proper classification of soils for compliance. Cesspools were specifically highlighted, with a consensus supporting their replacement given their typical placement below the water table.

47:18Also discussed was the need for portable water tests, particularly for nitrogen levels in shallow wells or lots with significant waste loadings, which was deemed a prudent regulation. The Board agreed to adjust future meeting dates to avoid conflicts.