0:00A primary concern centered around the septic system serving a three-bedroom residence on Wood Avenue. The system’s thousand-gallon tank, despite meeting Title 5’s minimum capacity requirements, was scrutinized due to its approximate 50-year age. Board members expressed skepticism about the structural integrity of the tank, with one member recalling that a crack was observed on its top. This raised the possibility of further inspections, potentially involving a structural engineer to assess the tank’s condition more thoroughly. However, the financial burden of such inspections and the risk of system failure were also acknowledged as significant factors for the homeowner.

In an effort to avoid costly legal proceedings, the board leaned towards reaching an amicable resolution that would satisfy environmental obligations without an excessive expenditure of taxpayer resources. This included discussions on formalizing and clarifying the board’s authority regarding septic system replacements, particularly those posing environmental risks.

The board also reviewed drafts of regulations related to Title 5 inspections and percolation tests. A recurring topic involved the distance requirements for septic systems, with one member reminiscing about a past discussion to reduce the separation distance from three feet to two feet. Despite considerations, it was acknowledged that such changes would not mitigate nitrate and nitrite pollution, given their tendency to percolate through soil. This prompted suggestions for advanced treatment options like the Ecopod system, which offers passive treatment capabilities.

17:35Another topic involved the property on Morgan Street, where a newly constructed three-bedroom house required a septic system approval. The proposed system included a 1,500-gallon, two-compartment tank with an outlet filter, addressing concerns about the high water table and nearby flood zones. The board expressed consensus, indicating satisfaction with the proposed system due to its distance from Stony Brook, minimizing potential environmental impact.

Further deliberations were held on a property on Jennifer Drive, initially designed for three bedrooms but with potential expansion to five bedrooms. This necessitated a Title Five septic upgrade. The board reviewed the design, emphasizing the importance of maintaining adequate groundwater separation and addressing high water table concerns. There was a focus on ensuring compliance with regulations while supporting property owners in their development efforts.

35:45The meeting also touched on a food truck permit for the Tie Place, requiring inspection at its base of operation. Additionally, a composting operation on Taylor Street was scrutinized due to wildlife being attracted to the site by visible food waste. Recommendations were made to better cover the compost piles, and the presence of recyclable cardboard was noted, raising questions about the carbon-nitrogen ratio in the composting process.

The board addressed a delay in liquor permits for Bruo Liquor due to concerns over their well’s stability. It was agreed that licensing could proceed, provided water met health standards. In another matter, a perk test for an unspecified property was confirmed, emphasizing the importance of coordination with engineers during the design phase.

In personnel matters, the board considered the nominations of Tom Fbot as animal inspector and Kim Goldsmith as his assistant. Potential conflicts of interest were discussed, given Kim’s involvement in a competing business. The board agreed to the nominations, provided compliance with established guidelines.

54:13The board’s conversation extended to logistical challenges, such as the continuation of remote meetings. Concerns were raised over a lack of clear direction from the governor’s office about future meeting formats. The board discussed potential venues for in-person meetings and the possibility of advocating for continued remote capabilities, emphasizing accessibility for members facing mobility challenges or illness.