The prospect of adopting waste management practices similar to those in Wellfleet, where a fee-based system encourages recycling, was also considered. However, implementing a pay-per-bag model in Granby raised concerns, particularly for families with young children who generate substantial waste. There was apprehension that such changes could lead to a rise in illegal dumping, described as a potential “border of health problem.” The board agreed to send a letter to the select board, offering to assist in finding a viable solution that safeguards public health.

In addition to waste disposal, the meeting addressed various infrastructure projects, including the septic system design for Red Fire Farm. Board members raised questions about the absence of special piping design for installations under a parking lot and the suitability of a portable gasoline generator for business operations. A consensus emerged that a fixed propane generator would better serve the farm’s needs, especially for food preservation. The discussion also touched on nitrogen sensitivity in the area, with board members noting that while the project claimed compliance with state nitrogen loading limits, the surrounding agricultural fields might contribute to contamination.

The board examined design plans with discrepancies, such as a contradictory note calling for 4,000 gallons of storage for a two-compartment tank. Concerns about handling non-sewage liquids were also addressed, with suggestions for directing them to a dry well, though no clear design was presented. Some members proposed considering a solar panel system with battery backup as an alternative to the generator issue, highlighting its sustainability and potential to avoid complications from gasoline storage.

In another notable discussion, the board reviewed a failed Title 5 inspection on Country View Lane, probing into the complications stemming from the property’s fill systems. The conversation delved into historical challenges with property development and maintenance, including humorous anecdotes about residents’ attempts at land clearance without proper equipment. The board also discussed the public water supply on East Street, particularly concerning the wine house operation. The wine-making process was found to produce minimal liquid waste, managed via existing drains, while solid waste was composted. The board recommended inviting the wine house representatives to future meetings to discuss compliance with health regulations.

Further deliberations covered the outdoor cafe project on West State Street. The board emphasized the importance of submitting plans for layout and sewage management, adhering to state codes for restaurant operations. Discussions included whether to classify the facility as a food truck, affecting operational regulations. The board expressed commitment to supporting the project.