A key topic of discussion was the application for a septic system installer’s license which raised concerns about the applicant’s qualifications. The board considered issuing a provisional license requiring closer supervision by a more experienced operator to ensure compliance with regulations. The concerns were particularly focused on a project on Amherst Road, where the engineer’s intimate involvement with the construction was deemed necessary.

Another issue discussed was the potential health impact of a local gravel pit. A resident suffering from health problems triggered by diesel fumes from the gravel pit was cited, prompting a debate about the select board’s responsibility to protect individuals from known health dangers and whether the public health nuisance process could be employed to address the issue. The delay in the issuance of a Wetlands report also stirred discussion, as it had implications for the gravel pit permit decision.

The board additionally reviewed three separate septic designs, expressing concerns about the lack of an effluent filter in one and the dimensions of the adjacent state highway in another. The design on Amher Road was particularly scrutinized due to the need to relocate the septic tank because of the property’s steep slope. However, the other two designs for properties on East Street and Chape Street did not elicit discussion, with the latter described as straightforward.

Further deliberations included the regulation of a retail food sales establishment and considerations regarding parking lot expansion, labeling, and approval of food items being sold. The Wine House, in particular, was under scrutiny for a complaint about inadequate lighting and accessible facilities, alongside a discussion about its operating hours during summer months.

In the domain of property and infrastructure, the board discussed boundary issues and permits for a specific address, focusing on the placement of a septic tank and the potential for state highway encroachments. They also debated the effectiveness and maintenance of a water treatment system installation and the necessity of a new well in the future.

The board addressed the complexities of a landfill permit application, emphasizing the need for thorough assessments and technical evaluations before a decision could be made. Members raised concerns about the health and safety issues related to the permit and the Board of Health’s role in providing specific recommendations on necessary assessments.

A broader environmental and health discussion unfolded over the statewide accelerated public health for every Community act, which was perceived as potentially reducing the authority of local Boards of Health and creating financial burdens. Members expressed concerns about the implications of this act on the community.

The meeting also touched upon the town’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, with a member expressing satisfaction with the town’s response. The online meeting format was praised for enabling greater constituent participation and interaction with elected officials. However, specific licensing applications for retail food and milk sales were critiqued for a lack of transparency, leading to a debate on the standards required for a proposed food service kitchen and developments at a site on West State Street.

Lastly, the board evaluated a structure that appeared to be an oil water separator or leeching basin, opting to gather more information before approving. Discussions on the replacement of a 46-year-old septic tank and the adequacy of a leech pit depth also took place. The members concluded without intervening in an ongoing investigation involving the Granby Bow and Gun Club, deferring to other authorities.