Central to the discussion was the question of whether the town should align its regulations with existing state laws or establish its own criteria to manage ADUs effectively. State law permits ADUs up to 900 square feet or half the size of the principal dwelling, whichever is less. This regulation prompted debate among board members about its impact on local governance and how the town might better manage these units. Participants expressed concerns about the adequacy of infrastructure, such as well water and septic systems, to support additional dwelling units. There was acknowledgment that compliance with state laws would require site plan approval.

The board deliberated whether their involvement in the ADU approval process was necessary, given the building department’s role in ensuring compliance with state regulations. Members noted that without a specific local bylaw, most ADU applications could proceed without board oversight, adhering instead to state guidelines and underlying zoning district requirements. This prompted a conversation about the potential need for new bylaws if local oversight was deemed necessary in the future.

Several board members suggested the creation of a bylaw to be reviewed in a public hearing if the Select Board found it necessary. The idea was to develop regulations that would prevent the misuse of ADUs and address concerns such as size, rental restrictions, and the financial implications for property owners.

In addition to ADUs, the meeting addressed the need for clearer regulations regarding public storage facilities. Concerns were raised about their classification under current zoning regulations, which the Building Commissioner deemed inappropriate. The discussion referenced a specific case involving a storage unit near Fin Hill. Suggestions included adopting regulations similar to those in other communities that clearly define criteria for public storage facilities, thereby avoiding ambiguity and ensuring compliance with dimensional regulations.

The board also touched upon general zoning bylaw amendments that could be prepared for the upcoming town meeting. The potential for a grant through the District Local Technical Assistance (DLTA) program was considered, which could aid in zoning reviews and planning efforts. Emphasis was placed on the need for a well-prepared approach to any amendments to avoid complications during town meetings.

Attention was given to aligning proposed changes with a forthcoming stormwater bylaw amendment required by the EPA. The board discussed the necessity of amending zoning and subdivision regulations to ensure compliance with federal standards. Clarification was sought from the EPA regarding the language to be used in these amendments to communicate effectively the potential impacts of the stormwater bylaw to the town. The importance of stakeholders understanding the benefits and consequences of passing or not passing the amendments was emphasized.

Towards the end of the meeting, the board reviewed minutes from previous sessions, which were approved without further discussion. The board also considered an application concerning the expansion of uses at the McDuffy School, including housing for instructors and recreational spaces. An initial meeting had been held to discuss current regulations and the steps required for approval, with an emphasis on streamlining the process for the non-local applicant.