At the forefront of the meeting was a discussion on enhancing library security following recent safety incidents that raised staff and community anxiety. A memo highlighting various incidents, such as unpredictable patron behavior and threats on social media, underscored the urgency of these discussions. The board took into account feedback from local agencies, including the Cook County Sheriff’s Office and BTR Architects, to explore strategies for improving safety protocols.

The board reviewed several recommendations from BTR Architects and federal assessments, including an increased focus on the installation of emergency exits and surveillance systems. The potential cost of an emergency exit, estimated at $35,000, prompted debates about funding and practicality. The architects also suggested implementing safe rooms and using technologies like surveillance cameras to enhance visibility and response times. However, concerns over patron privacy were raised, with one participant emphasizing that “privacy is a very strong value for us,” reflecting the complex balance the board aimed to maintain between security and accessibility.

In response to the security assessment by a member of the Department of Homeland Security, the board acknowledged the need for written security policies, routine training exercises, and engagement in community vigilance initiatives, such as the “see something, say something” campaign. The board also discussed the importance of clear communication during emergencies and considered strategies like window clings to obscure visibility and reinforce glass against potential threats.

The feasibility of creating safe rooms and modifying the library’s layout was debated, with specific attention given to the children’s desk area. Some proposals suggested removing the desk in favor of open spaces for better visibility, although staff expressed reservations about relying on patrons to intervene during crises. The dialogue extended to the potential installation of additional emergency exits and lighting improvements to ensure staff safety, particularly during nighttime hours.

The board also grappled with the logistics of performance evaluations for the library director. There was consensus on the advisory nature of the board, prompting discussions on developing a hybrid evaluation tool focused on library performance rather than personal assessments. The board considered incorporating metrics for programs, services, and technology utilization, recognizing the library’s role in providing community access to resources.

Suggestions for a structured review tool to provide feedback to the city sparked debate, particularly regarding the incorporation of performance metrics.

In tandem with these discussions, the board recognized the achievements of library staff, noting the successful circulation of over 500 books through displays created by a library clerk. Programs like Dungeons and Dragons and upcoming events, including a writer in residence series with Brian Malloy, were highlighted as fostering community engagement. The board also acknowledged the successful expansion of programming across the Arrowhead Library System, illustrating ongoing efforts to enhance library services.