Participants delved into the nuances of private events versus public spaces, particularly regarding cannabis consumption in designated areas. A key point of debate was the distinction between public and private campgrounds. This distinction is crucial because, under the proposed ordinance, unless campgrounds have specific low-potency hemp edible licenses or retailer’s licenses, on-site cannabis consumption would be prohibited. This interpretation aligns with existing public use regulations.

The proposed ordinance also introduced a retail registration process for cannabis businesses, scheduled to launch on September 22nd. This process necessitates that applicants have full licensure from the office of cannabis management. The county attorney is responsible for reviewing the proposed process, which the board must ultimately approve.

An issue revolved around the setback requirements for cannabis businesses, particularly concerning schools, daycares, and treatment facilities. The ordinance is set to apply mainly to new businesses seeking cannabis licenses, with existing businesses not being stripped of their licenses. Participants discussed how these requirements might hinder new business opportunities and create conflicts with existing establishments, especially in small towns with limited space.

The discussion also touched on the implications of low-potency THC products sold at restaurants and gas stations. The current zoning restrictions might inadvertently limit new businesses, as many existing ones could be located within the proposed buffer zones. This led to a debate on whether to maintain the setback requirements or remove them for low-potency businesses.

In parallel to the cannabis ordinance, the meeting addressed the need for fairgrounds renovations. The pavilion at the fairgrounds, crucial for community events, faces severe structural issues, with a roof beginning to collapse and an unstable foundation. Scott Libmer reported a current loan balance of approximately $15,700 after payments, expressing concerns over the pavilion’s deteriorating state. The estimated cost for repairs stood at around $500,000, covering basic structural needs without additional electrical or finishing work.

As the fair experiences growing attendance, addressing the pavilion’s condition before the next event season is essential. The fair board explored various funding avenues, including support from local organizations, to finance the new structure. They highlighted the need for additional space to accommodate vendors and provide shelter during extreme weather conditions.

The board expressed a commitment to consider the pavilion’s future in upcoming budget discussions. A request was made for the county to increase their budget allocation from $25,000 to $50,000, which would include $50,000 to finance the building project. The need for county support was emphasized, with the fair board’s representatives communicating their commitment to finding solutions and collaborating with the county.

In addition to these major topics, the board reviewed other routine matters. The highway department presented its annual report, introducing an updated bridge replacement priority list for the next five years. A resolution regarding the Barrett Tax Increment Financing district was approved, and the Viking Library System’s budget request for a 1% increase in 2026 was discussed. The board also addressed technological advancements through Geographic Information System (GIS) applications.