The meeting’s primary focus was the ongoing discussion about developing a noise ordinance. Residents Kate Broton and Mary Sum, from Precinct 7, voiced the concerns of their neighborhood regarding noise disturbances, particularly from activities at the fairgrounds. They recounted the formation of a neighborhood association following a meet-and-greet event with the mayor, where noise issues were a central concern. Their group has since investigated noise ordinances in other municipalities, gathering data from 80 communities and narrowing it to 30 relevant examples. The council recognized that existing noise complaints are varied, ranging from loud parties to persistent business-related noise, each requiring different handling strategies.

The police chief’s insights were noted, stressing the importance of a robust permitting process for noise-generating events. There was debate over the balance between community enjoyment and maintaining residents’ peace, with suggestions to strengthen the application process to preempt potential issues. Participants also recalled past vetoed attempts to enact a noise ordinance in 2012, which failed due to enforceability concerns. The importance of early public input in the drafting process was emphasized, contrasting with previous approaches that lacked initial community involvement.

In addition to considering the impact on residents, the council acknowledged potential effects on local businesses, such as landscaping and construction services. The contentious issue of leaf blowers was raised, with suggestions to involve landscape business owners in discussions. Ideas for a public forum were proposed. The Sustainable Green Fields Implementation Committee was mentioned as a potential partner in promoting sustainable practices, such as providing electric leaf blowers.

Another topic was the management of delinquent properties, particularly a deteriorating building on School Street. A council member expressed frustration over the owner’s inaction following a fire, leading to a problematic environment with reports of raccoons, rats, and illegal dumping. The council discussed the need for accountability procedures and interim safety measures, such as fencing, while noting the legal and financial challenges involved in resolving such issues.

The complexities of managing non-compliant properties were further examined, with a call for better communication among city officials and residents. Approximately 30 properties are under review, with some in receivership or needing demolition. The conversation highlighted the importance of reassuring residents that the city’s intentions are not punitive but focused on addressing serious safety concerns. A council member emphasized the need for transparency and proactive communication, distinguishing between minor maintenance issues and significant public safety risks posed by abandoned buildings.

The existing vacant and foreclosing property ordinance, which imposes registration fees and fines, was discussed, with suggestions for updates to address current challenges, particularly with bank-owned properties. The council acknowledged the difficulties in enforcing maintenance on properties owned by distant banks and the need for secure vacant properties to prevent unauthorized access.