One notable issue discussed was the city’s process of taking properties due to unpaid taxes. Residents Al Norman and Stephanie Duclo voiced their concerns during the public comment section. Norman criticized the city for taking a property on River Street over $1,300 in back taxes without offering a repayment plan. He stressed that the system was flawed and expressed dissatisfaction with how the city handled tax foreclosures. Duclo echoed Norman’s sentiments, questioning the transparency and communication in notifying property owners of their situation. Her comments suggested that property owners, potentially living out of state, might be unaware of the risk of losing their homes.

The council also tackled the question of zoning regulations for animal medical centers. A representative sought to establish a veterinary clinic in an area currently not zoned for such businesses, arguing that current definitions of animal hospitals and clinics do not reflect modern practices. The council debated whether to allow such facilities in rural residential areas, with some members advocating for the inclusion of animal clinics due to their low noise and disruption levels. Others raised concerns about fairness and spot zoning, particularly in areas adjacent to general industry zones.

In addition to zoning and property seizure concerns, the council deliberated on the management of neglected city-owned properties. The conversation revealed numerous properties in disrepair across Greenfield, with some labeled as hazardous. Council members discussed the legal and ethical responsibilities of contacting heirs of deceased property owners before proceeding with sales. The council emphasized the importance of transparency and public communication regarding their efforts to manage these properties, exploring solutions such as selling properties to developers to address housing needs.

The meeting also addressed the logistics of selling surplus properties, focusing on River Street and Cheapside Street. The mayor clarified that the intention behind these sales was not financial gain but to improve neighborhood aesthetics and return properties to the tax rolls. The council acknowledged the need for clear internal processes to notify next of kin and provide them with the opportunity to retain their properties. Concerns about potential legal fees and the risk of diminishing funds available to distribute to heirs were also discussed.

The council recognized the importance of maintaining clear communication with the public and documenting efforts to reach out to property owners to ensure transparency in the process.