The council’s conversation on electronic communication during meetings was marked by an exploration of the balance between maintaining decorum and embracing modern communication methods. One council member voiced skepticism about the reliance on personal integrity in these practices, remarking, “I also lack faith—I don’t trust the ability of people to uphold an honor code anymore.” This sentiment highlighted concerns about the potential for private messaging among members during meetings, which could compromise transparency. Another member pointed out the legal ambiguity, stating, “Technically, the open meeting law would allow… if I wanted to text you during an open meeting, I could do that.” Despite the absence of severe penalties for violations of open meeting laws, the council underscored the importance of upholding a standard of conduct to ensure public trust.

In another significant matter, the council delved into the handling of citizen petitions, notably one concerning zoning laws related to roosters. A council member questioned the council’s obligation to respond to petitions that might violate state law, emphasizing the need for a legal consultation to clarify procedures. The council decided to hold the petition for further review while still allowing residents to voice their concerns during public comments. Anecdotes shared about the disturbances caused by roosters underscored the issue’s impact on residents, with one member expressing frustration over the noise from neighbors’ free-range chickens.

The council also addressed the topic of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), opting to move discussions on two proposals to the January Economic Development Committee agenda to ensure thorough consideration.

The scheduling of the city council reorganization meeting was another point of discussion. Set for January 7th, this meeting aims to elect a new president who would manage committee chair schedules and memberships. The council expressed a need for flexibility among committee chairs to facilitate a smooth transition. Notably, the city charter amendments have eliminated the requirement for delivering notices for special meetings, simplifying communication logistics.

The memorandum of agreement between Greenfield and Mass Cops Local 470 was introduced for its first reading and directed to the Ways and Means Committee for further consideration. Concurrently, the council was reminded of the upcoming February 5th deadline for addressing a voter petition on ADUs, highlighting the necessity of obtaining a legal opinion to resolve potential regulatory issues.

Zoning amendments were also on the council’s agenda, with discussions focusing on amendments to sections 12, 40, 48, and 14. While forwarding a recommendation for a council vote was intended, the possibility of additional amendments was acknowledged. The council noted the need to confirm quorum for the upcoming meeting due to expected absences.

The council briefly debated hybrid meetings, seeking clarification on whether an amendment would require a public hearing. It was clarified that while financial items necessitate first and second readings, ordinances require a public hearing. The council resolved to hold this hearing in subcommittee next week before proceeding with a vote in December.

An issue concerning idling trains attracted attention, as council members reported receiving multiple emails from constituents troubled by trains idling beyond the 30-minute state regulation. This concern, echoed by other members, has become more frequent, prompting the council to consider adding the topic to next month’s agenda for further exploration and potential resolution.

The Community Relations Committee discussion was postponed due to a lack of specific items, resulting in the cancellation of the December meeting. The Ways and Means Committee mentioned the memorandum of agreement as the sole agenda item, with the possibility of additional first readings, though nothing was confirmed.