The search for a new superintendent dominated the meeting, with the committee deciding to engage NASDAQ for their extensive experience in conducting superintendent searches across New England. The decision, supported by a unanimous vote, underscored the importance of involving a professional search firm to guide the process and transparently. NASDAQ’s proposal included a plan for community engagement, featuring web-based questionnaires and focus groups with stakeholders such as parents, teachers, and students. This approach aims to gather diverse input on the desired qualities for the new superintendent. The committee also appointed Vice Chair Ston as the liaison for the process, with the task of proposing a structure for an advisory committee to guide the search.

Financial management was another critical area of discussion. The business manager presented updates on the FY26 budget, noting the need for adjustments due to personnel changes and special education requirements, which could potentially lead to a $91,613.76 deficit. The committee explored the implications of these financial shifts, including the utilization of revolving accounts like the circuit breaker and school lunch funds, to offset operational costs. The conversation highlighted the district’s strategic decision to use reserves for current operations while planning for future budgetary needs.

The committee also addressed the complexities of special education transportation services. There was a debate about the necessity of hiring an external consultant to analyze the current transportation model, particularly given the substantial costs associated with in-house services. Some members argued that the $10,000 expenditure for the consultant’s analysis might not be justified, considering the existing information and past analyses provided similar insights. Others viewed the analysis as essential for validating transportation strategies and addressing community concerns. The motion to postpone the decision on hiring an external firm was passed, allowing for further deliberation.

In tandem with these discussions, the committee emphasized the importance of maintaining a collaborative relationship with the City Council, particularly given their role in funding the school department. There was an acknowledgment of the need for clear communication channels and structured interactions to ensure mutual respect and understanding. Concerns about representation at City Council meetings were raised, with calls for establishing guidelines to facilitate productive engagements. The committee underscored the need for proactive communication.

The meeting also touched on the potential reintroduction of composting practices within schools, an initiative that had been on hold since the COVID-19 pandemic. The Superintendent outlined the costs and logistical challenges associated with re-implementing composting, including pest control and custodial labor. A motion was passed to develop a proposal for reinstating composting at the high school level.