A resolution for an airport grant agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation was a primary focus. Public discussion centered around the lack of information and awareness concerning the airport project. Attendees requested additional workshops and open conversations to foster better understanding and transparency. Skepticism about the return on investment of the regional airport was also voiced, along with a suggestion to consider partnering with Franklin County. Questions about the airport’s design and operations were raised, with the public seeking more detailed information regarding the project. In response, the council detailed the history and progress of the airport, including legislative appropriations and the partnership with St. Joe Company. Council members clarified the county’s role in channeling federal grant funds and ensured that the airport would be publicly accessible. They addressed the design and operational concerns, pointing out the FAA permitting process and the engagement of consultants.

Another public safety concern was the potential impact of the proposed airport on a neighboring rifle range. An attendee questioned the safety of the airport, considering the possibility of stray bullets. In response, council members assured that the airport’s location, miles away from the rifle range, would mitigate any risks. They further clarified that the airport’s use would be limited to emergency situations and not for regular flight operations.

The council also approved the chairman to sign an amendment to a loan agreement and recommended approval for a mutual aid agreement between the beaches fire department and the city of Mexico Beach. A policy was discussed that prohibits law enforcement from using excessive force against non-violent demonstrators. While there was some debate about the policy’s potential limitations on law enforcement, it was ultimately clarified as a requirement for HUD funding and aligned with Florida statutes.

In addition to infrastructure discussions, the council approved roofing projects for the Boiler Room and the Washington complex, which were included in the capital fund budget. The Gulf County Citizens Coalition for a Healthy Future presented concerns regarding oil exploration in the Apalachicola River Basin. They urged the council to respond to the drilling company’s plans and advised on the timeline for opposition. The lack of notification from the FD about the explorations and the potential downstream impact was a point of concern.

Traffic issues were another significant topic, with council members emphasizing the need for long-term planning to address increasing congestion on certain roads. The importance of advocating for local needs and priorities was underscored, particularly concerning dangerous intersections and the implementation of caution lights for enhanced safety. While viewpoints on addressing traffic and infrastructure challenges varied, the council agreed on the importance of prioritizing the safety and well-being of local citizens.

The meeting concluded with an acknowledgment of the need for a contingency plan in case of a spill or train derailment affecting the water supply. It was mentioned that both the state representative and state senator are opposed to an unspecified matter and that the council has a limited time frame to register their opposition.