A central theme of the public comments was a strong opposition to the ordinance, which many argued would criminalize homelessness. Residents expressed concerns about the vague language of the ordinance, which they feared could lead to selective enforcement based on appearance, and the harsh penalties it proposed. One speaker highlighted that individuals could face fines and jail time simply for lacking a safe place to sleep. Many speakers underscored that such punitive measures would only exacerbate the struggles of low-income individuals, pushing them further into debt and making it harder to secure housing or employment.

Several speakers called for a compassionate approach, drawing attention to the wealth disparity in Haddonfield and urging the council to leverage resources to provide permanent housing and supportive services. A representative from the Green Party of New Jersey emphasized the broader social and economic factors contributing to homelessness, urging the council to address corporate influence on housing prices and to consider raising the minimum wage.

The discussion also included insights from individuals with personal experiences of homelessness. A resident recounted their past struggles, highlighting the support they received from their church community and urging the council not to criminalize those who are already suffering. Similarly, Father Neil Ramen, a local priest, questioned the timing of the ordinance in light of new shelter resources being developed nearby and urged the council to focus on humane and researched responses to homelessness.

The police chief provided statistics on homelessness-related calls, noting an increase in such calls compared to the previous year.

The proposal was discussed as a starting point for gathering public opinions, with the intention to refine the ordinance based on feedback. Some members expressed concern that punitive measures could lead to selective enforcement and potential legal challenges, while others emphasized the need for accessible public restrooms and collaboration with social services.

In addition to the homelessness ordinance, the meeting addressed other issues, including land use for wireless telecommunications, the reappropriation of funds for firefighting equipment, and accessibility improvements in Haddonfield. The council also discussed the potential impacts of the Port Authority’s decision to shut down the Patco system, which serves as a shelter for unhoused individuals, during certain hours.