01:46:32The board’s approval of the Royal Plaza site plan was an outcome of the meeting. The proposal includes a tan-colored existing structure with a one-story addition for retail use and a two-story addition for medical office use. The plan also features 34 parking spaces, including two ADA-compliant spaces and an EV-ready space. However, the board deliberated over several parking-related issues, such as setback variances due to the limited site area and environmental restrictions.

Key considerations involved the proposed two driveways for ingress and egress, which deviated from the ordinance requirement of a single driveway for the 220-foot frontage. The Department of Transportation (DOT) had issued a letter of no interest regarding this configuration, which was designed to improve site access and minimize traffic confusion. Despite this, a potential waiver was necessary to proceed.

Parking setbacks were another area of focus. The ordinance required a 20-foot setback, but the proposal included a 4-foot setback along the side and a 5-foot setback in the rear due to the building’s location. The site plan also incorporated curbing around most of the site, with wheel stops on the eastern side to facilitate drainage from an adjacent wellness center.

35:12The board addressed the challenge of balancing the site’s parking needs with environmental concerns. The limited area for parking, attributed to the building’s location and environmental restrictions, necessitated several variances. Additionally, the proposal suggested employing curb stops instead of traditional curbing to accommodate drainage requirements, prompting discussions about alternative stormwater management practices, such as permeable pavers or bio-retention areas.

33:04Accessibility was a important topic, particularly concerning the transition from residential to commercial use. The board highlighted the need for verification of compliance with accessibility requirements, especially for the second floor, which remained inaccessible. The planner was advised to ensure thorough compliance with ADA regulations.

49:41The discussion also included the architectural modifications planned for Royal Plaza. The architect emphasized creating a cohesive appearance by using similar brick and paint colors across the complex’s three sections. Five entryways would receive architectural treatments, with three featuring gables and two having flat roofs. The board expressed skepticism about the design’s aesthetic integration with the existing house, with concerns that the office’s appearance seemed awkwardly attached to the house.

01:00:36Signage and circulation for Royal Plaza were other focal points. The proposal included a sign to enhance site identification, particularly for the medical office located at the rear of the property. Given the potential for traffic confusion, the board considered the need for wayfinder signage to assist with circulation. However, it was agreed to defer additional signage discussions until tenant information became available.

02:13:03The meeting also explored the idea of installing sidewalks along Route 38, a topic that generated considerable debate. The board recognized the potential safety benefits of having sidewalks, but the lack of existing pedestrian infrastructure posed challenges. Some members expressed concerns about the safety risks associated with the transition from three lanes to two lanes in front of the site, which could lead to accidents. Ultimately, the consensus leaned against the necessity of sidewalks.

02:06:05The board also discussed delivery logistics, agreeing that deliveries would occur between 7 AM and 7 PM, with larger vehicles scheduled during off-peak hours to minimize disruption. The specifics of grading and utility plans were reviewed, including the use of Riverstone at discharge points. The need to manage water drainage effectively was emphasized, particularly concerning a planned leach field and the wet conditions of the property.