31:35Currently, the district’s student code of conduct includes guidelines for cell phone use, with some teachers choosing to collect phones at the beginning of class and others asking students to keep them out of sight. Data revealed only four official write-ups for cell phone violations this year, alongside four self-managed warnings. However, concerns were raised about broader issues linked to cell phone use, such as the impact of social media on mental health and student well-being. Instances of dangerous behavior inspired by social media trends were noted, including an incident involving a student mimicking a risky TikTok challenge that resulted in injury.

Board members discussed the potential need for additional funding to support any new policy changes, such as purchasing cell phone lockers. The timeline for implementing new regulations remains unclear, as no definitive dates have been provided by the Department of Education. The board emphasized the importance of engaging parents and students in the decision-making process, seeking to learn from other districts’ experiences while considering possible unintended consequences of any new policy.

45:34The conversation also touched on financial implications, noting the costs associated with systems like Yonder pouches, which lock phones during class hours but allow access during breaks. Board members debated the feasibility of a complete or partial ban, expressing concerns about the additional burden such policies might place on teachers. Some suggested swapping cell phones for Chromebooks in classrooms, though logistical challenges were acknowledged.

Parental feedback highlighted mixed feelings about current cell phone procedures. While some parents voiced safety concerns, others valued the ability to remain in contact with their children. The board recognized a lack of parent-driven discourse on the subject, with previous Parent Academy sessions not focusing specifically on cell phone issues.

15:44Beyond cell phone policies, the board meeting addressed other topics, including the district’s financial status and upcoming budget preparations. A corrective action plan was set to address these findings, with some corrections expected by October 2025.

During the finance discussion, the board considered the use of emergency reserves to address unplanned expenses, such as a pipe issue in the cafeteria. With total reserves reported at $6,306,866, the board distinguished between planned maintenance and unforeseen issues, determining that county approval is needed to access emergency funds.

Committee reports highlighted personnel and management issues, including the hiring of new staff to replace a deceased cafeteria aide. The finance committee reported on budget discussions, noting a recent county meeting about charter schools, which serve 63,000 students across 86 schools in New Jersey, seven of which are in Patterson.

Policy updates were another focal point of the meeting. The board reviewed new policies recommended by Strauss Esme, a company providing policy updates for various districts. While some policies were mandated by the New Jersey Department of Education, others were optional. The board decided to table non-mandated revisions for further review and focus on mandated policy updates.

The board also discussed curriculum and technology, with questions arising about eighth-grade field trips. A proposed trip to Six Flags prompted debate about the educational value of recreational trips versus traditional educational experiences. While younger students were encouraged to focus on educational trips, it was deemed appropriate for middle school students to engage in more social activities.