One of the major topics discussed was the proposed roadway development and requested waivers for several lots within a subdivision. The applicant sought to reduce the road width from the standard 30 feet to 22 feet, eliminate sidewalks, and use alternative materials for construction. These proposals were met with opposition from residents, particularly concerning the absence of sidewalks. A resident highlighted safety concerns, noting the dangerous conditions on Hayward Street due to its narrowness and lack of pedestrian pathways. They stressed the necessity of sidewalks in light of ongoing construction and increased traffic, emphasizing that “if anyone’s walked down Hayward Street, you probably break your leg.”

The conversation about the roadway also touched upon using Cape Cod berms instead of granite curbing, the use of high-density polyethylene (HDPE) pipes over concrete, and allowing overhead utility lines instead of underground installations. A resident named Diane Bradford expressed her concerns about the road’s functionality, advocating for the inclusion of sidewalks and stating, “I just think they can give a little bit.” The Commission acknowledged the need for a peer review to examine the structural integrity of the piping and other elements before reaching a decision.

Another focal point of the meeting was the subdivision modification for Hildene. Joe Webby of Webby Engineering presented a request to shorten the roadway by approximately 200 feet. The Commission sought clarification on whether a peer review was necessary for the requested modifications and discussed the importance of comprehensive documentation to support any decisions. The need for ongoing communication between departments was emphasized to ensure all aspects of the project were clearly understood, particularly concerning wetland crossings.

Simultaneously, the Commission examined a special permit application from Jeremy Jamulus of Cape Cod Café. The café had installed a window sign exceeding the bylaw’s permitted area, and Jamulus sought to retain it for branding and visibility purposes. Despite the aesthetic appeal noted by Commission members, the lack of a quorum prevented a ruling on the permit. They suggested that Jamulus return for the next meeting after measuring the sign and windows to ensure compliance with the bylaw.

Towards the end of the meeting, the discussion turned to Deal Away, a significant and longstanding issue concerning road conditions linked to a specific property. Participants voiced frustration over delays in resolving the matter, with one individual questioning the motivations behind these setbacks. The dialogue centered on the potential release of a lot and the associated road completion, with considerations for bonding to ensure the road’s development. The necessity of a bond was highlighted as insurance for the road’s completion, with a motion made to keep the discussion active for a future meeting on December 19.

As the meeting concluded, a package from an individual named Mark Pierce was introduced, with handwritten notes that were difficult to decipher. The Commission decided to forward the package to the police chief for evaluation before passing it to the selectmen.