The most notable item on the agenda was the site plan review for 350A Industrial Drive, proposed by Mr. Paul Nukem. The board was under pressure to decide before the application’s expiration on May 26, 2025. Initial discussions revealed a lack of updates from Mr. Nukem since his initial request to be moved to the meeting on April 29. Board members expressed concern over the timeline and the potential consequences of denying the application, which would bar Mr. Nukem from reapplying for two years. To mitigate this, they considered a letter offering Mr. Nukem the choice of requesting an extension or risking constructive approval.

During the proceedings, an email from Mr. Nukem requested a 60-day extension, which prompted the board to amend their initial decision. The motion to grant this extension was seconded and passed unanimously. The board tasked Danielle Akeke with informing Mr. Nukem and completing the necessary paperwork. This decision emphasized the board’s intent to protect the town’s interests while allowing applicants the opportunity to comply with requirements.

Meanwhile, the board also deliberated on the site plan review for a property on Plymouth Street, related to a plant nursery situated in a historical district. Concerns were raised regarding the placement of a shed on the property and whether the applicant had engaged with the historical commission. It was clarified that if the shed was set back sufficiently, the commission might not have jurisdiction, which could simplify the approval process for the business. These considerations underscored the need for applicants to navigate complex regulations when operating within designated historical areas.

As the board grappled with these site plan reviews, they also managed routine matters, such as approving previous meeting minutes and discussing invoices. An invoice from PGB Engineering for work related to another site on Industrial Drive was approved without objection.

In addition to addressing pressing site plan concerns, the meeting also marked a notable transition within the board. Rick Murray’s departure was acknowledged with expressions of gratitude for his contributions. A member expressed appreciation, saying, “His participation and membership on the board has been extremely appreciated and thank you for your time and effort. We’re going to miss you.” This farewell highlighted the camaraderie within the board and the value they place on each member’s service.

The meeting concluded with a light-hearted moment as the board moved to adjourn, pausing to acknowledge Murray’s departure once more. The final motion to adjourn was seconded and passed unanimously, bringing the session to a close.