The meeting began with a focus on Gram Construction’s application for a special permit to construct a common driveway serving three adjoining lots. Due to incomplete drainage reports and necessary soil calculations, the board decided to postpone the public hearing to February 12, 2025. This decision allows more time for the engineering firm, led by individuals identified as “Bob” and Cafarelli, to finalize their reports. Chair Madison Pixley emphasized that relevant information for the application remains available for public inspection.

As the meeting progressed, the board reviewed a proposal from a representative of the CH Land Trust. The representative presented an updated plan to alter the size and driveway configuration of a 2.1-acre lot. The board clarified that it could not grant the requested variance for multiple driveways, directing the representative to the Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) for further action. Despite the setback, the representative was open to reverting to the original plan if the ZBA denied their request.

Attention then shifted to a detailed examination of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and the implications of existing regulations. The board engaged in a thorough discussion about the scale and parking requirements for ADUs, highlighting the need for at least one off-street parking space, which could be situated in a driveway or garage. This sparked debates on whether existing parking spaces in a multi-car garage could satisfy ADU parking requirements without necessitating additional permits.

Additionally, the board scrutinized the definition of building “scale” for ADUs, focusing on size limitations. Questions arose about the legality of constructing a 400-square-foot ADU within the parameters of a larger residential property. The conversation also touched on the necessity of clarifying definitions within the bylaws, particularly concerning non-conforming properties and setback requirements.

The potential impact of ADUs on the town’s water supply drew discussion. The board questioned whether the water district could accommodate increased demand if many residents opted to build ADUs. Concerns about the sufficiency of water supply led to discussions about requiring Board of Health approval for any ADU-related water issues.

The board also explored the implications of short-term rentals on platforms like Airbnb, with concerns about frequent tenant turnover and the resulting impact on local housing dynamics. A suggestion was made to require leases for ADU rentals to ensure stability, though the board acknowledged potential enforcement challenges.

Finally, the board discussed procedural matters related to site plan approvals and special permits for additional structures associated with ADUs, such as garages. It was noted that the planning board could impose reasonable conditions on submitted plans, provided they align with existing bylaws and Massachusetts General Law.