Hampden Selectmen Address Town’s Infrastructure and Public Safety Concerns

In a recent meeting, the Hampden Board of Selectmen tackled a range of issues from infrastructure improvements to public safety enhancements. Notably, the board discussed the installation of fiber optic cables to enhance connectivity for emergency services, the management of the local wildlife sanctuary, and the upkeep of the town’s cemetery. Plans for infrastructure upgrades, such as the addition of security cameras and emergency phones, were also on the agenda. Furthermore, the meeting covered the regional school district assessment, the potential expansion of the regional dispatch service, and the installation of EV chargers.

One focus of the meeting was the infrastructure updates planned for the town. The board debated the installation of fiber optic cables that would connect the police department, town hall, and fire department. The possibility of adding security cameras and a dedicated emergency phone outside the fire station was also discussed. This would ensure that residents have a method of contacting emergency services even when the fire station is unattended.

The management of Laughing Brook Wildlife Sanctuary raised environmental concerns, specifically regarding the use of herbicides near public water supply areas. The New England Mass Audubon Society representatives, who proposed a project focusing on invasive plant management and forest management, assured the board that they would follow strict guidelines and seek further approvals. Dead wood in the sanctuary was identified as a safety hazard, prompting discussions about potentially closing trails to mitigate risks. This was part of a broader conversation on environmental stewardship and public safety.

The board also contemplated the future of the Hampden Regional School District, discussing a letter concerning the district’s assessment. This encompassed the method of calculation and the frequency of payments, which are critical for the district’s financial planning and stability.

Another topic was the regional dispatch service. The board considered expanding the service to include an additional town and discussed the benefits and challenges of such an expansion. They also reviewed a proposal from the state to cover 100% of the costs for an additional year, which would influence future developments and enhancements to the dispatch center’s infrastructure.

There was a conversation about the cemetery’s maintenance and financial challenges, including issues with a damaged gravestone and water erosion. The board discussed the need for a new clerk to manage the cemetery and deliberated over the budget allocation of $5,500 for erosion repair. They expressed concern about whether the area in question was addressed and if the work was completed. There was also mention of the potential for grant funding to support the old cemetery.

The meeting touched on the replacement of a town bridge, with the board scrutinizing the estimated cost of almost $2.25 million. They questioned the necessity and decision-making process for the replacement, as well as the use of grant money for research without visible progress.

Public safety and health also came into play as the board discussed the installation of beehives around a playground. While recognizing the importance of pollinators, concerns were raised about potential allergy risks for children using the playground. Additionally, the board addressed a request from National Grid for a temporary license to support the installation of EV chargers and deliberated on establishing a school zone outside the North Road school.

The meeting also covered financial matters, such as the potential funding for Peg access and the appropriateness of seeking additional funds from Charter. Discussions ensued over the release of money from the overlay reserve for town projects, with debate centering on the amount and intended use of these funds.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: