The meeting also delved into recent zoning changes affecting properties transitioning from residential to business zoning. A discrepancy was noted in the assessor’s map, which still showed the zoning as residential despite approval by the town meeting and validation by the attorney general’s office. The board underscored the importance of a detailed site plan outlining the project’s scope and adherence to zoning and environmental regulations.

Further discussions explored zoning complications on Elm Street, where proposals to rezone industrial properties for additional residential development faced challenges. The board addressed the split zoning of a front parcel and the potential for combining parcels to meet zoning requirements. The conversation included the limitations imposed by the minimum square footage required for multifamily units and the complexities of using a right-of-way for frontage. The board acknowledged the importance of maintaining open communication with the community while navigating the regulatory framework.

Attention then turned to stormwater management, with the board addressing compliance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standards. A proposed stormwater bylaw was discussed, with concerns about potential non-compliance and penalties if not adopted by the February 2, 2026 deadline. The board evaluated existing zoning bylaws and considered whether integrating current regulations with new requirements could suffice. The Pioneer Valley Planning Commission’s zoning diagnostic was mentioned as a tool to identify compliance issues, with a focus on aligning the town’s regulations with EPA standards.

The meeting also covered the housing production plan, emphasizing its importance for completion by October. The board discussed the timing of a zoning diagnostic that could affect zoning maps and allowed uses, potentially impacting data critical for the plan. The need for updated zoning to facilitate proactive planning was highlighted, with the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission tasked with establishing an implementation committee for the zoning diagnostic process.

Additionally, the board addressed specific parcels of land, including 104 and West Street, where a zone change from rural residential to light industrial had not been legally recognized due to administrative oversights. The board expressed frustration over the lack of communication from the landowner, despite their supportive stance. The complexities of zoning issues were further illustrated by a parcel listed for sale on Zillow as two lots, despite being legally one parcel, complicating potential developments due to zoning requirements for multifamily housing.