A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to evaluating the town’s zoning bylaws. Representatives from the Pioneer Valley Planning Commission presented a detailed review as part of a District Local Technical Assistance project. Planners emphasized the need to update zoning bylaws in accordance with the goals of the Hatfield 2040 comprehensive plan. The review highlighted the importance of a collaborative approach between the planning board and zoning board of appeals to enhance the bylaws’ effectiveness. Notably, the presenters distributed a draft zoning bylaw diagnostic, which served as the basis for seeking input from board members on priority areas for improvement. This diagnostic is expected to guide the completion of this review phase by October, supporting efforts to finalize the housing production plan.

The meeting also addressed structural issues within the zoning bylaws, particularly the organization of provisions related to accessory dwelling units (ADUs) and marijuana establishments. Concerns were raised regarding the placement of ADU regulations amid non-conforming structures, potentially confusing applicants. Similar issues were identified with medical marijuana regulations, which were awkwardly numbered within stormwater management sections. Board members suggested a more intuitive organization to enhance clarity and user-friendliness.

Additionally, the discussion centered on clarifying non-conforming property regulations, with specific reference to a case involving a property on North Street where a house had burned down. The board explored the implications of rebuilding on a non-conforming lot, given the town’s requirement to rebuild within two years of a catastrophic event. Legal counsel clarified that the board could permit such reconstruction through a special permit, underlining the necessity for precise bylaw language regarding non-conformities.

Another focal point was the potential adoption of village center form-based zoning, which would foster pedestrian-oriented village centers. This approach aligns with the town’s complete streets initiative. Emphasis was placed on coordinating with public works and administration to achieve this vision, especially if new village centers are designated.

The board also discussed the need for updated provisions on solar energy systems, acknowledging that state law requires reasonable regulation of solar installations. Recommendations included defining solar array sizes, refining special permit criteria, and establishing design and landscaping standards. These updates are intended to ensure compliance with state mandates while promoting sustainable energy development.

Concerns about the accessibility and coherence of existing zoning regulations were prevalent throughout the meeting. Participants highlighted the need for procedural flowcharts and cross-referenced hyperlinks within digital versions of the bylaws to simplify navigation for residents. Such tools would aid in understanding application processes and zoning requirements, making the bylaws more accessible to the public.

The inclusionary zoning topic was also broached, with discussions on mandating a percentage of affordable units in new residential developments. Although currently optional, the board considered making it a requirement to enhance affordable housing options. Furthermore, the regulation of short-term residential rentals emerged as a issue, with the board recognizing the need for clear guidelines and enforcement mechanisms.