At the forefront of the meeting was the proposal to convert a historic single-family home on Elm Street into six multi-family units. This proposal, intended to provide affordable housing options, faced significant zoning hurdles due to the property’s location within an industrial zone, where multi-unit residences are typically prohibited. The Planning Board deliberated on whether the existing pre-existing non-conforming use could be legally extended to accommodate the proposed development. Concerns about potential legal challenges from neighbors and the need for a variance to change from single-family to multi-family use were raised. Board members expressed a shared interest in preserving the architectural integrity of the historic structure while navigating the zoning bylaws to facilitate the project.

The board acknowledged the need for legal guidance and agreed to consult with town counsel to clarify bylaw language. The conversation also explored the possibility of rezoning the area to rural residential, which would provide more flexibility for residential development, but still require a special permit for a six-unit structure. The board members were mindful of the legal ramifications and expressed a cautious approach to ensure that any decision made would withstand scrutiny and potential legal appeals.

This grant positions the town favorably to undertake a review and update of its zoning regulations, an effort described as more substantial than what other communities typically receive. The board considered innovative zoning strategies, such as form-based codes and smart growth zoning under state programs like 40R, which could qualify Hatfield for incentive payments for housing developments. Engaging the community in these discussions was deemed critical to shaping future zoning maps and strategies.

The board also deliberated on the need for modern housing amenities, such as electric vehicle charging stations, in new developments.

In conjunction with zoning revisions, the board discussed updating bylaws related to home-based businesses. The current regulations, which limit home-based businesses to occupying no more than 50% of a dwelling, were identified as potentially needing reevaluation. The board reviewed a model bylaw that suggested more restrictive measures, particularly for detached garages, and considered how to balance encouraging local entrepreneurship with maintaining community standards. The need to clarify and formalize definitions and allowances for home-based businesses was underscored.

Additionally, the board addressed the need for compliance with the EPA’s stormwater management requirements. They opted to pursue a general bylaw for stormwater management. Concerns about the feasibility of drafting the necessary regulations within the limited timeframe were discussed, with a proposal to form a subcommittee to collaborate with engineers on this task.