Hatfield Select Board Faces Public Works Challenges Amid Key Personnel Changes

During the recent Hatfield Select Board meeting, the focus centered on the Department of Public Works (DPW), addressing issues like personnel changes and financial management. A topic was the interviews for the new DPW Director, which highlighted the complexities of managing infrastructure in Hatfield and the need for strategic leadership amidst staffing changes. The board also discussed budgetary adjustments, particularly the increase in water meter reading fees and the implications of federal funding cutbacks on ongoing projects.

12:35Among the top priorities was the selection of a new Director for the Department of Public Works. The board conducted interviews with potential candidates, emphasizing the importance of leadership in navigating the complexities of public works operations and community engagement. Candidates discussed their experiences managing significant projects and dealing with budget constraints, highlighting the need for effective communication and strategic planning in maintaining town infrastructure.

13:56One candidate, Tony Wasowski, described his role in managing a major water transmission project and emphasized the need for improved guidance for junior staff. He discussed challenges such as staffing shortages and the declining interest in blue-collar jobs, reflecting broader issues facing public works departments nationwide. Tony’s insights into managing grants and his familiarity with municipal operations presented him as a strong contender for the director position.

08:54Another candidate, Randall, brought experience from his tenure as a Highway Superintendent, where he managed large projects like the East Street Bridge replacement. Randall highlighted the challenges of gaining respect in leadership roles and the difficulty of attracting qualified applicants due to competitive salaries in the private sector. He stressed the importance of understanding the town’s unique infrastructure needs and the potential tensions arising from internal candidates vying for the same position.

11:08The board also deliberated on budgetary matters, approving a proposed increase in the water meter reading fee from $25 to $50. The board noted that the new fee is consistent with rates in other towns.

25:29In addition to personnel and budget issues, the meeting addressed the transition from dual-stream to single-stream recycling, facilitated by a significant three-year grant. This initiative involves the acquisition of new automated trucks to enhance driver safety and consolidate town assets management. The board recognized the importance of such grants in supporting infrastructure improvements and the DPW’s role in implementing the town’s comprehensive plan, which includes economic development and infrastructure maintenance.

19:57Public communication emerged as a critical theme, with candidates emphasizing the need for effective strategies to keep residents informed about infrastructure issues like road closures and water main breaks. The importance of transparency and accountability in public works operations was reiterated, particularly in managing taxpayer expectations and ensuring community safety.

03:34A speaker raised concerns during the public forum about a perceived lack of communication regarding the town’s decision to shift decal production responsibilities away from Hatfield Printing and Publishing. The speaker expressed frustration over the loss of their longstanding business relationship with the town and their exclusion from the Housing Authority after raising safety concerns. The chair acknowledged these concerns but noted that public comments could not be addressed directly during the forum.

01:03:44The board also discussed operational changes at the town hall, considering a pilot program to adjust operating hours based on resident attendance patterns. The proposal included opening the town hall earlier in the morning and closing at noon on Fridays to better accommodate public needs.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: