Headline: Raritan Planning Board Delays Flemington Junction Hearing Due to Stenographer Absence

In a recent Raritan Planning Board meeting, a scheduled hearing for Flemington Junction Associates was postponed due to an unexpected procedural issue: the absence of a court stenographer, a requirement outlined in the board’s ordinance. Despite the applicant’s readiness to proceed with audio recording, the board decided to adhere to its established practice requiring a stenographer, causing the hearing to be rescheduled.

The issue arose when the representative for Flemington Junction Associates, Roman numeral III, addressed the board, explaining that a court stenographer was not sent to the hearing room as mandated. Instead, a gentleman prepared to make an audio recording was present. The board, emphasizing consistency and adherence to its ordinance, declined to proceed with audio recording alone, despite the applicant’s request to continue with an audio-visual option as an alternative. The representative expressed readiness to move forward, highlighting the effort and expense already involved in preparing for the hearing, but respected the board’s decision to defer the hearing.

The board discussed possible rescheduling options, considering the approaching holidays and the board’s existing commitments. Ultimately, they tentatively agreed to reconvene for the hearing on December 18, provided the applicant submits revised plans by December 6. The board assured that no further public notice would be necessary, as the change in schedule was announced during the meeting.

In addition to the Flemington Junction matter, the board briefly touched on logistical concerns surrounding the scheduling of special meetings, noting the financial and procedural requirements involved.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: