The Milani Park project has long been a contentious issue within Highland Beach, with many residents expressing apprehension over the park’s proposed features and associated parking facilities. During the meeting, the town manager shared updates on the park’s development, including architectural selections and conceptual designs featuring mature shade trees, a winding boardwalk, and lookout areas. However, the design has sparked debate among residents, who are concerned about the park’s impact on congestion and safety.

Local resident Maggie Chapelier, involved in natural resources and beach restoration, articulated a common sentiment, urging for a “plan B” should initial plans not proceed as desired. She emphasized the need for reduced parking in favor of amenities like bicycle racks to foster community engagement. Her view represents a faction of the community advocating for modifications to the county’s existing plans, a stance that has been met with both support and opposition.

Further complicating the situation, different perspectives emerged regarding the Milani family’s willingness to negotiate changes to the project. Some residents, like John Shoemaker, acknowledged the family’s readiness to reconsider their stance and urged the commission to seize this opportunity to find a mutually agreeable solution. Others, including Claude Castro, warned that the park could become a “nightmare” unless the town takes action.

There were logistical concerns regarding the proposed parking capacity of 100 cars, with residents like Peter Kasovski arguing that such an influx would overwhelm local law enforcement and fire services. He advocated for a scale-down to align the park with the town’s size and character.

Throughout public comments, a clear division emerged: some residents firmly opposed the park development due to potential issues like parking congestion and safety hazards, while others acknowledged the challenges of the county’s existing contract and stressed the need for strategic negotiation to secure better terms. Dr. Rick Greenwald emphasized the county’s firm stance on proceeding with the park, advising that instead of resisting, the town should focus on negotiating enhancements like safety features and bicycle infrastructure.

The Milani family, represented by Cam Millenia, expressed a willingness to discuss the park’s development, acknowledging the emotional weight of the situation and reaffirming their connection to the community. However, legal realities were highlighted by others, noting that the county is legally bound to proceed with the park, limiting the town’s capacity to influence changes.

Beyond the park debate, the meeting also touched on a resolution supporting House Bill 517 and Senate Bill 840, aimed at protecting municipal clerks’ personal information. This resolution was unanimously passed, reflecting concerns about the safety of clerks who manage elections and code enforcement, particularly in a contentious environment.

Additionally, the town commission discussed Florida Department of Transportation construction on A1A, which has resulted in delays and safety concerns. With construction running a month behind schedule, residents were urged to prioritize bike safety and pedestrian awareness during the busy season.

Temporary signage regulations were another topic, with discussions on potential changes to current codes to address the proliferation of for-sale signs and maintain the town’s aesthetic appeal. The complexities of regulating these signs, particularly concerning legal implications and enforcement challenges, were acknowledged. Suggestions were made to look at neighboring municipalities’ regulations as a guide.