The primary topic of discussion was the proposed phased ban on gas-powered leaf blowers, which has been a contentious issue in Highland Park. The task force leading this initiative highlighted findings on the negative effects of noise pollution from gas-powered leaf blowers, citing impacts on residents’ sleep and concentration. The task force proposed a two-year phased approach, beginning with a partial ban during peak leaf season and eventually leading to a full ban.

The council deliberated on the feasibility of enforcing such regulations, given the borough’s limited staff for enforcement. Concerns were raised about ensuring compliance in the early stages, with references to experiences from other towns like Maplewood, which has implemented a similar ban. There was an acknowledgment of the need for additional outreach to stakeholders, including commercial landscapers and apartment complexes, to communicate the new regulations and implementation timeline effectively.

Economic impacts were also a part of the discussion. It was noted that two out of seven landscaping companies might consider leaving Highland Park if the ban is enforced, while others might increase their rates. The council considered exploring state-level tax incentives to help offset the costs of transitioning to electric equipment and proposed bulk discounts for electric tools, although the legality of such arrangements was questioned.

The council also discussed restricting the operating hours of leaf blowers to alleviate early morning noise complaints. A pilot program was proposed during the two-year phase-in to assess the feasibility and impact of the ban, though some argued that a firm deadline would better ensure compliance.

Further, the council addressed potential inequities of the ban, noting that many landscaping workers are from minority backgrounds and could be disproportionately affected. Concerns about tariffs on landscaping equipment and their financial burden on businesses were also raised.

In addition to the leaf blower regulation, the council tackled amendments to the redevelopment plan for Track A, which includes areas from 101 Raritan Avenue to the new Alen café. Proposed amendments included allowing residential units on the ground floor and clarifying height regulations for new constructions. Concerns about waste management, particularly the visibility of trash cans, were discussed, with a focus on minimizing visual impacts on the community.

Zoning regulation changes were another major topic, with proposals to modernize and expand permitted uses in commercial zones. The council explored allowing indoor amusement establishments and clarifying regulations for gyms, studios, and banks, while maintaining prohibitions on fast food and drive-thrus. Amendments also proposed permitting brew pubs, wineries, and creative spaces for the arts.

The council debated allowing ground-floor residential units in commercial zones, a move aimed at increasing affordability and accessibility. The discussion acknowledged historical planning preferences for commercial ground-floor uses to prevent dark streets after business hours, but some members expressed skepticism about this model’s effectiveness. The potential for increased housing opportunities was weighed against concerns about maintaining a lively commercial atmosphere.