A major concern was the outdated zoning map, which failed to incorporate changes from multiple ordinances enacted over the past two decades. A planner explained that various amendments had not been accurately reflected on the map, leading to misclassifications of zones, particularly commercial and light industrial areas, such as those along Cleveland Avenue. This oversight has resulted in discrepancies between the map and actual land uses, affecting both developers and residents.

The planner emphasized the need for an interactive zoning map that would provide clearer, more accessible information to both officials and the public. This proposal received positive feedback as board members recognized the potential benefits of such a tool in reducing confusion around zoning designations and redevelopment plans. The board also discussed separating the stream overlay zone from the general zoning map to alleviate confusion, agreeing that clearer mapping strategies were essential.

In addition to map inaccuracies, the meeting addressed issues with zoning ordinances, particularly within the Central Business District. The board considered the implications of residential properties interspersed among commercial establishments, raising questions about compliance with current zoning regulations if these properties were sold or redeveloped. The complexities surrounding pre-existing non-conforming uses were highlighted, with concerns that property owners might lose grandfathered rights upon redevelopment.

Concerns were also raised about the stream overlay zone’s reliance on outdated FEMA floodplain maps. The board discussed the need for precise language in ordinances to ensure timely updates whenever FEMA revised its maps, preventing legal issues and confusion from outdated references. Suggestions included labeling zoning references with specific FEMA map dates to enhance transparency and accountability.

The professional office designation within the Central Business District was another focal point, with recommendations to broaden this designation to encompass all district properties. Board members argued that a broader designation could allow for more varied commercial uses, particularly in prime locations near Main Street, thus unlocking potential future development opportunities.

To conclude the session, a motion was made to determine the ordinance under review as not inconsistent with the master plan, accompanied by separate recommendations for addressing the stream overlay zones. The motion passed unanimously.