One resident, identifying herself as Dorine from Edison, strongly opposed the resolution, citing fears of impaired driving due to cannabis use. She shared an incident where her vehicle was surrounded by “hot smoke” from a passing car, expressing reluctance to travel through Highland Park. Dorine linked cannabis shops to increased crime, given their cash-based operations, and voiced discontent with the borough’s decision to permit multiple dispensaries.

Another resident, Melissa Gu, urged the council to reject the resolution for Floro, noting that this would be the fifth dispensary in town. She highlighted the unpleasant odors and litter associated with living near such businesses, posing concerns about pedestrian safety, especially for children and elderly churchgoers. Gu emphasized the need to revitalize vacant businesses instead of adding more cannabis shops, challenging the council to reassess the town’s trajectory.

Mary Madison echoed these sentiments, referencing a fatal incident involving THC impairment to underline public safety risks. She shared an alarming account of a neighbor’s dog ingesting a potentially dangerous substance during a walk, raising concerns about the impact on pets in the community. Madison emphasized that Highland Park’s reputation as a dog-friendly town could be jeopardized by more dispensaries, urging caution.

The discussion also touched upon the involvement of prominent community figures in the cannabis business, with Madison questioning the relationship between developer Brett Tansman and the proposed shop. Colleen Tyler added to the critique, urging the council to reject the resolution and lamenting the lack of public input in decision-making. Tyler pointed out that decisions had been made without a public referendum.

Amid these discussions, it became clear that the community is divided on the issue of cannabis dispensaries, with many residents advocating for more transparent decision-making. The council acknowledged these concerns, with a member promising to discuss the situation with the police chief to address issues such as the reported increase in DWIs.

After addressing the cannabis dispensaries, the council moved on to other agenda items. Council Member George reported on public safety initiatives, praising the Highland Park Police Department for a successful junior police academy. The program, which received positive feedback, aimed to educate youth about police work and community engagement. George also highlighted National Night Out’s success, which featured various public service displays.

In other developments, Council Member Vargas announced an upcoming concert at Donaldson Park and highlighted the arts commission’s community engagement through workshops. He expressed gratitude for the community center staff’s efforts in providing diverse programming and mentioned grant applications pursued by the historical commission for a marker commemorating a Revolutionary War site.

Economic development was another focus, with a council member recounting a recent positive experience shopping locally and encouraging community support for local businesses. Upcoming poll banners for light posts along Raritan Avenue were also mentioned, with thanks extended to the Main Street Design Committee for their contributions.

The planning board meeting was also a topic of discussion, scheduled to assess whether Sonoko Station and nearby properties qualify as areas in need of redevelopment. The hearing will gather testimony on the properties’ conditions, emphasizing collaboration with property owners to revitalize underutilized spaces.

Additionally, updates were provided on the South Third pedestrian plaza project, with community input gathered during stakeholder meetings. A significant meeting is set for August 20, where residents can learn about the project’s history and provide feedback.