The most notable development at the meeting was the council’s decision to amend chapter 10 of the borough code, lowering fees related to buildings and housing. The proposed ordinance 02523 was a key agenda item, and it involved reducing the fees associated with the uniform construction code fee schedule for continuing certificates of occupancy from $125 to $30. After confirming that there were no questions from council members, the ordinance proceeded to a public hearing. Despite the opportunity for public input, no questions were raised, resulting in the ordinance passing without opposition.

In related discussions, the council addressed the borough’s personnel policies and procedures manual. These amendments occur biennially, as mandated by the insurance policy. The updates were described as routine, with training scheduled for later in the month. The resolution adopting these amendments was also passed unanimously.

Another resolution involved the transfer of surplus funds, a recommendation by the Chief Financial Officer. Following brief discussions, this resolution was similarly adopted unanimously by the council.

The council also adopted several resolutions as part of the consent agenda, including designating Art Chica Builders as the exclusive redeveloper for a vacant lot on Bay Avenue. This property is part of the redevelopment zone, and council members expressed enthusiasm about the potential for development, which includes flood-proofing and the possibility of creating retail and residential spaces.

During the administrative report, the council highlighted the borough’s strong performance in terms of best practices. They addressed inquiries concerning the budget and environmental considerations, including the presence of a vehicle charging station.

Public comments brought attention to unresolved issues in the borough. Resident Katie Joseph expressed frustration over flood mitigation efforts, stressing that ongoing flooding issues had not been adequately addressed. She referenced previous commitments made by municipal staff to resolve these matters. Joseph argued for the necessity of filling a specific crater site, as water continued to flow towards her property, undermining protection measures. Her remarks drew attention to the perceived ineffectiveness of current flood control strategies, emphasizing the need for a more robust solution.

Another public comment focused on the misplacement of hay bales intended for erosion control. A resident detailed their frustration, explaining that eight hay bales were mistakenly installed in the wrong area. The resident, who had previously contributed to placing 40 hay bales, highlighted the simplicity of rectifying this mistake. They criticized the lack of communication and follow-up from the council, having been unaware of the installation for several weeks.

The meeting also touched on climate change, with discussions referencing a report from Rutgers University. The report outlined significant findings, including increased variability in precipitation, more intense storms, and rising sea levels. A participant questioned the council’s plans to protect the community against these changes, particularly in light of a previously proposed coastal protection project that failed due to poorly worded ballot questions.

The council clarified that the cancellation of the Mammoth Hills project was part of a broader decision affecting projects nationwide. They emphasized ongoing collaboration with state and county officials, exploring grants and funding opportunities for future projects. A speaker noted discussions with state-level entities. The council conveyed a commitment to exploring all available options, acknowledging the broader challenges communities face regarding climate resilience and infrastructure funding.