A representative from Eminem at Camplain Road LLC requested to carry the Sherman Track phase two application to the next meeting due to an issue with notice, and the board adjourned the hearing to May 2nd, 2024. The board then moved on to discuss J&J Steel and Tubing Inc.’s application for a building addition, which required variance relief for several zoning issues, including impervious coverage and parking. The expansion is necessary for the company’s contract to produce handrails for New York City Subways.

Alpine Construction representatives raised concerns about parking issues, which were affecting their operations. They discussed plans to double their parking spaces to remedy the situation. A member of the public, Valerie Parker, supported the construction project but urged for an improved design to enhance the area’s aesthetics. Witnesses provided detailed descriptions of the site changes, addressing stormwater runoff, tree mitigation, and compliance with recommendations from various commissions.

During the meeting, parking was a recurring topic, with several individuals raising concerns about parking deficiencies and its implications for emergency access and the overall functionality of the affected areas. Proposals to address these issues included the creation of designated no parking zones, striping on roads, and installation of no parking signs.

The proposed development of two warehouses at 189 and Homestead Road became a prominent issue as the public and board examined the environmental impact of the project. Expert witness Ed Cook discussed the need for a 150-foot buffer zone to the stream to protect the habitat and provide a better environment, as required by the township stream corridor ordinance. The discussion also explored the potential benefits of the proposed development, such as the improvement of water resources through buffer zones and plantings.

Concerns were expressed about the impact of alien and invasive plant species on the property and the potential benefits of incorporating grassland bird habitat into the development. The project’s stormwater management plan was scrutinized, with emphasis on its compliance with water quality and flood control regulations to minimize the impact on the stream corridor and wildlife.

The debate extended to the impact of noise, light pollution, and runoff from trucks associated with the warehouses. The expert witness assured that the stormwater management plan would address these concerns and that the land use would accommodate disturbances once established.

The potential impact of the development on birds, particularly grassland birds, was a concern. The expert witness addressed the risk of bird strikes by noting that the proposed buildings did not have a lot of glass. A conservation easement was also discussed to ensure the implementation of grassland management recommendations.

The meeting also touched upon the issue of whether a height variance was required for a proposed property development, with the board focusing on the interpretation of the town’s definition of building height and the potential need for variance relief. There was a debate about the scale and size of the proposed building, the adequacy of the reports in addressing these aspects, and the relevance of certain testimony.