Hillsdale Borough Council Faces Divided Opinions on Memorial Field Overhaul
- Meeting Overview:
The Hillsdale Borough Council meeting on December 10, 2024, focused heavily on the debate over proposed upgrades to Memorial Field. The discussion featured a variety of community voices, illustrating a divide between those who support the improvements and those who have reservations about the project’s financial, environmental, and community impacts. The council also addressed ongoing issues such as local health services and parking regulations.
The most significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the proposed overhaul of Memorial Field, a project that has been in discussion for several years. The proposed upgrades, including the installation of a new turf field, have sparked a discussion among residents and council members. Those in favor argue that the upgrades are essential for the development of youth sports in Hillsdale. They cite the need for a proper home field for local teams, which currently have to contend with inadequate facilities that often result in shared spaces and canceled practices. Advocates also highlight that modernizing the field could enhance property values and reduce injuries, according to studies mentioned during the meeting.
James Lawler, representing a local sports association, emphasized the necessity of the upgrades, advocating for the inclusion of lighting at Memorial Field with a 9:00 p.m. cutoff to address neighborhood concerns. The sentiment was echoed by other residents who see the upgrades as a long-overdue investment in the community’s youth programs.
However, the project is not without its critics. Several residents raised concerns about the financial implications of the $6 million budget allocated for Memorial Field’s improvements. Questions were raised about the prudence of investing in one field at the expense of other sports facilities, such as Centennial and Stony Brook Fields, which are also in need of attention. The financial concerns were compounded by discussions about the potential issuance of a long-term bond to fund the project, which some residents argued might not be justified given the estimated lifespan of the facilities.
Traffic, noise, and environmental impacts were also central to the debate. Residents living near Memorial Field expressed apprehensions about increased noise and traffic congestion, particularly during peak sports seasons. Concerns were voiced about the potential disturbances that might arise from extended field use and the addition of lights and a PA system. Suggestions were made to mitigate these issues through permit-only parking on nearby streets and implementing buffer zones with landscaping to reduce noise.
The council acknowledged the need for a balanced approach, with some members advocating for a comprehensive evaluation of all recreational facilities in town to ensure equitable improvements. The meeting included a motion to develop a financial plan to support the project, emphasizing the importance of keeping the community informed and involved in the process. A request was made to disseminate a document summarizing the project’s timeline and proposed changes to ensure transparency and accountability.
In addition to the Memorial Field discussion, the council addressed other topics. Councilman Ruko reported on the Board of Health’s recommendation to replace current health services with those from the County’s Department of Health Services, a move projected to save the borough approximately $47,000. The transition raised concerns about whether the county could provide services comparable to those currently offered by Northwest Bergen Regional Services. Stakeholders are expected to meet to clarify the scope of services provided by the county.
Councilman Oso commended the local fire department for their effective response to a recent fire incident and updated attendees on the department’s activities and upcoming events, including a lighting event in Veterans Park. The meeting also covered ongoing parking issues, with residents proposing a residence-only sticker system to address problems arising from outdated ordinances prohibiting street parking during specific hours.
The council’s closed session touched on matters related to attorney-client privilege and borough personnel. A point was raised about the need for greater transparency in the session’s agenda, specifically mentioning the Hillsdale Police Department. The emphasis on transparency reflects ongoing concerns about the council’s communication with the public.
Michael Sheinfield
City Council Officials:
Robert Colletti, Jr, Justin Fox, John Escobar, Janetta Trochimiuk, Clemente Osso, John Ruocco
-
Meeting Type:
City Council
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
12/10/2024
-
Recording Published:
12/10/2024
-
Duration:
74 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
New Jersey
-
County:
Bergen County
-
Towns:
Hillsdale
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 12/09/2025
- 12/09/2025
- 79 Minutes
- 12/09/2025
- 12/10/2025
- 178 Minutes
- 12/09/2025
- 12/09/2025
- 182 Minutes