The commission’s approval of the local historic designation for a property on Medina Avenue was a key focus. Designed by architect Martin Hampton in 1925, the property exemplifies the Mediterranean Revival style, featuring elements like decorative columns and a bell tower-inspired chimney. A presentation emphasized the home’s historical and architectural significance, detailing its role in the broader development of Coral Gables as a planned community inspired by the Garden City movement. The commission’s decision was unanimous, with members expressing appreciation for the home’s cottage characteristics and its embodiment of historical architectural trends.

Similarly, the designation of 2716 Cordova Street as a historic landmark underscored its significance within the minimal traditional architectural style, a response to the economic constraints of the Great Depression. Designed by William Shanklin in 1938, the property was praised for its representation of a shift in architectural trends in Coral Gables. The house retains its historic integrity, with historical associations noting its importance in reflecting the cultural heritage of the city. The commission unanimously approved the designation.

In contrast to the straightforward approval of historic designations, the commission faced a more debate over the replacement of windows on Lune Road. The property, a contributing resource in the Dutch South African Village Historic District, became the center of a code violation issue due to the unauthorized installation of low emissivity (low E) windows. These windows were noted for their green tint, which conflicted with the city’s long-standing policies requiring clear glass in historic contexts to preserve architectural integrity. The commission ultimately denied the after-the-fact design approval, emphasizing the need to maintain historical standards and expressing concern about setting a precedent for future modifications.

The meeting also included a discussion about a proposed copper cap for a chimney at a historic home, where opinions among the commission were divided. Some members supported the addition, citing its minimal visual impact and potential for future removal. However, others argued that it deviated from the home’s original design. Despite differing views, the motion to approve the copper cap passed with the condition that shop drawings be approved as part of the permit revision.