34:06The most contentious topic addressed was the potential removal of a property from the 40C district, a local historic designation. Concerns were raised about procedural lapses, specifically the lack of proper notification to both the commission and the Massachusetts Historical Commission. A member stated the importance of adhering to procedural norms, emphasizing that changes should be communicated to all relevant parties before any state-level actions. The commission expressed a unified stance against removing properties from the district. A motion was made and unanimously approved to seek a legal opinion from the city’s law department, highlighting the need to clarify the ramifications of the boundary changes for the property on Rock Street. This move was seen as a critical step to ensure compliance with historical preservation regulations and to rectify any missteps.

17:50In addition to the boundary issue, the commission discussed a significant restoration project at the Fall River Congregational Church, located on Rock Street. Representatives from the church sought a letter of support for a Community Preservation Act grant application. The restoration project, which carries an estimated cost of $4 million, focuses on addressing structural issues like stonework repointing and water ingress prevention—a necessity given the building’s current state after 115 years since its last major repair. The church representatives shared that they had already invested over $600,000 in repairs since late 2024. The commission was informed about scaffolding already in place for ongoing work, with an emphasis on making the stairwell towers watertight as a priority. The church’s application for a $250,000 grant from the Community Preservation Committee was discussed, with the understanding that the funds would be matched by other grants.

The church, designed by architects who were students of H.H. Richardson, a notable figure in the Romanesque revival movement, is registered in the National Register District of the Highlands. The commission unanimously supported the church’s grant application, recognizing the project’s importance in preserving a community structure. The members expressed their appreciation for the church’s efforts and encouraged further engagement with the community to maintain architectural and historical integrity.

The commission also tackled the need for improved communication and administrative processes within the district. A member pointed out the inadequacies in the current system, where property owners might unknowingly breach regulations due to lack of information. This concern was highlighted by a former co-chair, who noted that the absence of a formal overlay zone complicated the identification of properties within the historic district. The commission agreed that better education regarding preservation laws was necessary, especially for zoning board members, who had previously expressed the possibility of demolishing historic properties. This led to discussions about potentially presenting to the zoning board to ensure they fully understood the protections offered by the 40C district designation.

In other business, the commission discussed the expansion of the Highlands local historic district. Surveys were sent to property owners to gauge interest, with a deadline set for June 30. However, only three responses had been received by the meeting, raising concerns about the effectiveness of the outreach efforts. Alexander Silva, president of the Preservation Society of Fall River, read a draft letter intended for property owners, emphasizing the district’s ten-year anniversary and the importance of maintaining its historic properties. The commission aimed to encourage participation in the survey to support expansion efforts.