33:32The meeting’s focal point was the application to elevate the 1928 Tudor Revival home. The principal planner outlined the property’s historical significance, emphasizing its contribution to both local and national historic districts. The proposed elevation and modifications raised several concerns among board members and stakeholders, particularly regarding the impact on the home’s architectural style. The planner highlighted the inconsistency in window dimensions and the overall design’s deviation from the original Tudor Revival aesthetics.

25:55A significant part of the discussion revolved around the proposed changes to the home’s facade. The planner suggested conditions to ensure that new elements, such as windows and the wraparound porch, would align with the structure’s historical character. The board considered the planner’s recommendation for conditional approval, emphasizing the need to preserve the historic integrity while accommodating modern needs. Specific conditions included redesigning the facade stairs to incorporate a landing and revising the fenestration plan to reflect the original architectural details.

Architect Daniel Edgell, representing the homeowners, addressed the board to justify design choices and respond to the proposed conditions. He explained the challenges in balancing structural requirements with aesthetic considerations, particularly concerning the window sizes and the staircase design. Edgell noted that extending the stairs could lead to zoning setbacks, requiring a variance.

48:02The board also examined the landscaping plan. The design of the wing wall was another focal point, with Edgell suggesting that raising it alongside the house would enhance its appearance, given the house’s elevation. Public comments included support from Rene Torres, a retired architect specializing in historic preservation, who cited a precedent for elevation in the neighborhood and endorsed the applicant’s efforts.

50:31Deliberations continued with a focus on integrating the new construction with the existing structure. Board members debated the appropriateness of the proposed changes, particularly the porch’s design and the potential for creating a “blank wall” appearance. While some members were satisfied with the proposed stair design, others suggested modifications to avoid an incongruous street view.

01:01:17The board reached a consensus on several design elements, agreeing to use square balusters for the deck and supporting the garage’s carriage-style doors. After refining the list of conditions, a motion was made to approve the application with revised stipulations. This motion received unanimous support.