Historic Homes and Street Lighting Take Center Stage at Coral Gables Meeting

The Coral Gables Historic Preservation Board meeting focused primarily on the historic designation of 320 Romano Avenue, the review of proposed changes to a residence on Country Club Prado, and ongoing discussions with Florida Power and Light (FPL) about enhancing street lighting in historic areas.

01:13:02The board’s unanimous support for the local historic designation of the residence on Romano Avenue highlighted the property’s architectural and historical significance. The home’s distinctive features, such as varied roofs with barrel tiles, a belfry-inspired chimney, and textured stucco cladding, were noted for their contribution to the city’s developmental history.

52:38The designation of 320 Romano Avenue as a local historic landmark was substantiated by a detailed presentation from the Historic Preservation Coordinator. The presentation emphasized the home’s role as one of the earliest residential constructions in Coral Gables, aligning with Merrick’s vision of a Mediterranean-inspired city during the South Florida real estate boom of the 1920s. The board expressed particular appreciation for the homeowner’s initiative in pursuing this designation, recognizing it as an essential step in preserving the city’s architectural legacy.

01:15:03Attention then shifted to 1234 Country Club Prado, where a proposal for additions and alterations to the historic residence was under review. Designed by architect William Shanklin Jr. in 1936, the home was designated as a local historic landmark in 2021. The proposed project, led by architect Carlos Hernandez of Nandanda Design Studio, included plans for one and two-story additions at the rear of the residence. Hernandez emphasized that the additions aimed to expand living space for the family without altering the historic home’s original aesthetic.

01:35:26The board scrutinized the design proposal, focusing on the scale and massing of the additions. Concerns were raised about the potential for the new wings to overwhelm the existing structure due to their similarity in design. While some members supported the project, others stressed the need for distinct architectural differentiation to maintain the historic home’s character. The design proposal was approved with specific conditions, including modifications to ensure the garage door aesthetically matched the existing architectural elements.

02:07:58In a separate discussion, the board addressed ongoing efforts to collaborate with FPL on enhancing street lighting in historic areas. A recent meeting, attended by various stakeholders, was described as cooperative, with a collective desire to address existing issues. The board emphasized the importance of replacing current streetlights with decorative ones that align with Coral Gables’ historical aesthetics. There was a unanimous agreement to pursue further discussions and engage with other local governmental entities interested in similar lighting enhancements.

01:51:56Discussions also touched on the proposed legislation concerning unlawful demolition of historic buildings. The board deliberated on the implications of increasing fines for illegal demolitions, with potential penalties reaching up to 20% of the property’s fair market value. Concerns were raised about the legislation’s narrow focus, particularly its applicability to properties on the National Register but not locally designated. The board expressed interest in advocating for expanded legislative coverage to include local designations and potentially increase penalties for violations.

12:48Technical difficulties marked the beginning of the meeting, with audio issues causing delays. Members and staff engaged in multiple audio checks to ensure clarity and sound quality. As the meeting proceeded, the board expressed gratitude to a member who would be on maternity leave. The discussion also covered ongoing renovations at a historic home on Alhambra, where concerns about the extent of demolition were raised, prompting a review of previously approved plans.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: