Hoboken City Council Denies Parklet Application Amid Resident Concerns

In a recent Hoboken City Council meeting, one notable issue addressed was the denial of an application for a new parklet on First Street. The decision came after discussion and public comment regarding the notification process, impact on the neighborhood, and potential disturbances such as noise, traffic, and rodent infestations. The council moved to deny the application, citing inadequate notice to residents as the primary reason.

The application for the parklet, submitted by the restaurant Dear Mo Mod, had initially been modified to meet city ordinances. These modifications included a design aimed at minimizing noise and enclosing three sides of the parklet. However, concerns were raised by council members and residents alike regarding the potential for increased noise and disruption, as well as the restaurant’s compliance with its existing space. The debate extended to the adequacy of the notification process, with the Corporation Council suggesting a review of the impact of non-certified mail on potential appeal filers and the timeline for applications.

During the meeting, residents took the opportunity to express their concerns during the public comments section. They highlighted the potential for sidewalk obstruction, navigation difficulties around the area, increased noise levels, impact on property values, and a lack of transparency in the notification process. Specific worries included the strain on public safety personnel, increased foot traffic, and the effect of noise pollution on young children’s sleep. Residents also questioned the reduction of parking spaces on Garden Street and the need for security measures for the proposed parklet.

In response to the public comments, council members discussed the criteria for parklet approval and acknowledged the concerns raised. They sought clarity on the fate of existing tables and chairs on the sidewalk in front of the establishment, should the parklet have been approved. The council members also examined the dimensions of the proposed parklet and the criteria used for the approval process.

The issue of parklets and streetery applications themselves was a significant topic of debate. Council members discussed the legal adequacy of notifications and the impact of parklets on specific blocks, particularly the narrowness of First Street and its potential impact on pedestrian and vehicle traffic. While there was a general support for parklets, there was concern about the suitability of this particular location.

After a discussion, the motion to deny the approval of the parklet application was put forward based on the failure to provide adequate notice. The motion passed with a majority vote.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: