The main focus of the meeting revolved around a homeowner’s application for a zoning variance to build a 1,116 square foot garage-pool cabana combo with a height exceeding the town’s zoning limits. The proposed structure, intended to be 22 feet and 4 inches tall, surpassed the maximum accessory structure height of 15 feet and the size limit of 900 square feet. The applicants’ presentation included the proposed location of the structure and the necessity for the variance, with a particular emphasis on the second-floor usage, which they specified would be limited to storage without any water or gas connections.

Board members engaged in a thorough discussion about the details of the structure, including the potential for the second floor to be used as a separate living unit. Concerns were raised about the presence of a gas fireplace and the access to the second floor. The applicant provided assurances that the second floor would not include water or gas connections and described access as a 36-inch wide fixed set of stairs leading to storage space above the bathroom. Further, there was dialogue regarding the neighbor’s approval and proposed landscaping that would act as a buffer between the new structure and the neighboring property.

The council deliberated on the possibility of the cabana being converted into a living space in the future, which led to a debate on the inclusion of amenities like a shower and a fireplace. The need for deed restrictions to prevent the cabana from being rented out was discussed to mitigate this concern. The applicant also sought variances for setbacks, providing justifications for the requested relief and underlining the absence of objections from the neighbor closest to the proposed structure. The council addressed the potential detriment to the zoning plan and the need for an as-built survey to confirm the structure’s location before granting approval for the variances, subject to specific conditions and the submission of a deed restriction.

Another variance was on the meeting’s agenda, this time for a 445 square foot accessory structure. The applicant presented the need for the variances, highlighting the absence of negative impacts on the neighborhood or surrounding properties. The council weighed the distance from the neighbor’s fence to the proposed structure and its potential impact on public good. Again, the lack of objections from the closest neighbor was noted. After considering the possible detriment to the public good and the character of the area, the council approved the variances, contingent upon specific conditions.

In further discussions about the cabana, the council tackled the placement of an outdoor shower, contemplating its location in relation to neighbors and the pool. The proximity between the pool and the cabana was a concern, with discussions on the appropriate distance between the two. The council also probed into the potential installation of amenities such as gas, sinks, or bathrooms within the cabana, leading to a clarification from the applicant that the structure was primarily for rest and relaxation. Questions regarding the drainage system for the outdoor shower were brought up, with the council inquiring about the installation of a dry well. A decision was made to approve the construction of the cabana, with the stipulation that the outdoor shower be positioned on a side not facing the neighbor, beyond the 14-foot setback, and contingent upon a survey to validate its placement.

The meeting also alluded to a lawsuit concerning The Enclave, with a court hearing scheduled for the end of July. No further details were provided about the nature of the lawsuit or the parties involved. Looking ahead, the council hinted at future agenda items, including a larger sign application.