The board president opened the meeting by addressing the community about the upcoming referendum, which seeks to secure funding for essential capital projects that the current budget cannot cover due to constraints and inflation. The president clarified that if passed, the referendum would enable the district to access state aid covering approximately 25% of the proposed projects. Highlighting the critical state of the district’s infrastructure, the president noted, “Our finance and facilities budget has been flat for a long time, and it’s not keeping up with inflation.” The president underscored the necessity of these renovations, particularly in buildings nearing a century old.

One of the crucial points discussed was the rising enrollment numbers, which have necessitated the expansion of existing facilities. The president pointed out that some students are currently learning in trailers, raising safety concerns during emergencies and adverse weather. “I don’t want our kids outside the building,” the president emphasized.

Issues at Timberlane Middle School were particularly highlighted, where tree roots had compromised plumbing, leading to significant repairs, and a failing well pump almost resulted in the school’s closure. The board detailed the efforts required to maintain operations, with the president stating, “We were waiting on HVAC equipment that took two years and came damaged,” illustrating the broader issues of supply chain delays impacting the district’s infrastructure plans.

The conversation also delved into the financial mechanics of the proposed referendum, clarifying that the district would bond the $87 million progressively as projects are initiated. The board noted that 61% of the budget is earmarked for essential repairs, including roofing, HVAC systems, restroom updates, and backup well systems. The speaker warned that postponing these repairs could result in more severe consequences, such as interruptions in student learning due to building failures.

Public comments revealed community debate surrounding the bond referendum. Christine Ru from Hopewell Township criticized the transparency of the board’s recent appointment process and questioned the decision to include both essential and optional projects in the referendum. Ru suggested that the total ask of $87 million is substantial for a small community and criticized the timing of the special election. Other residents echoed similar concerns, emphasizing the need for better financial planning and prioritizing essential projects over optional ones.

The discussion also covered specific projects planned if the referendum passes, such as replacing leaking roofs at the high school and improving accessibility with new bathrooms and concession stands at the stadium. The proposal aims to provide a better experience, particularly for individuals with mobility challenges.

Concerns about the district’s per-pupil cost were addressed, with explanations linking high rates to smaller class sizes and extensive programs offered. The district prides itself on maintaining lower class sizes, particularly in kindergarten. Nonetheless, the financial strain of rising special education services was acknowledged, with costs for out-of-district placements ranging significantly.

Another notable topic was the New Jersey Graduation Proficiency Assessment (NJ GPA). A presentation revealed that while the district’s scores were above the state average, challenges remained, particularly for students with Individualized Education Programs (IEPs). The board discussed the need for targeted interventions to support underperforming groups, including Hispanic students, who showed a noticeable drop in readiness.

The meeting also included a presentation on environmental initiatives from the climate action transportation subcommittee. The subcommittee presented a report outlining actionable items for adopting environmentally conscious practices, highlighting the ongoing effort to balance financial limitations with environmental responsibilities.