The most notable issue was the proposal for a four-story self-storage building, which would be unprecedented in Howell. Mark Younger, representing Fort Plains Partners, confirmed that the structure would be climate-controlled and equipped with security measures, including regulated access through a code or fob system. Despite these assurances, board members questioned the necessity of a four-story building, especially given the existing and under-construction self-storage facilities in the area, which are smaller. They expressed concerns about the building’s height and size.

In response, Younger cited market studies indicating that self-storage facilities typically range from 100,000 to 150,000 square feet. However, the board requested further clarification on these studies, expressing skepticism about the necessity of the proposed size and height. The board emphasized the importance of adhering to local zoning regulations and community standards, noting that such a height had not been previously approved except in one instance tied to litigation.

Operational aspects of the storage facility were also scrutinized. Younger detailed that access to the storage units would be available between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., with no overnight access allowed, and the facility would have reduced office hours. The design included a robust security system to monitor tenant activity. Concerns about the potential for the storage units to be used improperly were addressed by confirming that lease agreements would comply with state regulations, allowing for inspections.

Further discussions highlighted the project’s implications for traffic management. The proposed site plan included redesigning the driveway on Route 9 to accommodate increased truck traffic, with pending approval from the Department of Transportation. The board noted that the self-storage facility would not typically see large tractor trailers, unlike the adjacent flex warehouse space, which would require significant loading and parking arrangements.

Traffic engineer input suggested that the redesigned driveway would minimize traffic interference with nearby entrances, such as Home Depot’s. The proposed site plan included 15 parking spaces and five loading spaces, with a 20-foot wide one-way circulation area around the building. Concerns were raised about traffic impacts on Fort Plains Road and West Farms Road, particularly given the problematic intersection that may require signalization improvements.

Public comments added another layer of complexity to the discussion. Residents voiced concerns about the project’s environmental impact, specifically regarding wetlands and stormwater management. One participant recalled a previous application from the 1980s that was rejected due to similar environmental concerns, emphasizing the need for a clear map illustrating restricted areas. The applicant assured that the development would not encroach upon wetland areas, with construction limited to the upland area closer to Route 9.

Socio-economic implications for local residents were also discussed. Concerns were raised about the urgency of relocation notices given to low-income residents living across the street from the proposed site. Many of these residents, including those with disabilities, faced significant challenges in finding new housing within the stipulated timeframes. The board clarified that the current application was not responsible for these housing issues, which stemmed from a court order related to code enforcement violations.

Further technical aspects of stormwater management were addressed, with assurances that the applicants would collaborate with township engineers to ensure compliance with updated stormwater control ordinances. The developers would need to demonstrate their stormwater management plan at the site plan stage, including conducting groundwater monitoring analyses to confirm no negative impacts on neighboring properties.