43:13The board’s deliberation on the flex warehouse proposal by Ford Plains Partners LLC dominated the meeting. The applicant sought to construct a flex warehouse and a self-storage facility, claiming their proposal was less intense than the zoning allowed. However, the board highlighted that “flex space” was not a permitted use in the HD1 Zone, as per the township’s 2022 master plan. The board expressed skepticism about the proposed development’s suitability, particularly due to the lack of secured tenants and clarity regarding the future use of the flex space. Concerns over traffic and safety implications were central to the board’s decision, with one member noting the potential negative impact on the residential neighborhood. This led to a unanimous vote to deny the requested variances, with the board concluding that the proposal did not demonstrate sufficient community benefit.

05:42In contrast, the board granted a bulk variance to Kevin and Danelle O’Connor for constructing an inground swimming pool at their residence on Pine Needle Street. The O’Connors’ application sought to improve their quality of life and enhance community engagement. The unique positioning of their property required a variance, as the improvements were classified as being in the front yard. The board considered the need for privacy and safety, especially concerning the proposed six-foot fence, which was seen as a necessary measure for the family’s children and pets. Despite concerns about the utility easement and the existing deck and shed, the board was satisfied with the stipulations for updated plans, including relocating the shed outside the easement and front yard. The board unanimously approved the variance, recognizing the hardship caused by the property’s corner lot configuration.

45:44The meeting also included a detailed presentation regarding a proposed development that aimed to secure a right-of-way from a nearby property owner, facilitating traffic flow without utilizing Fort Plains Road. The applicant planned to establish an easement for emergency access, featuring a gated entry and a Knox box. The proposal included a public storage facility and a flex building, each with separate access points to Route N. However, the board remained concerned about the flex building’s appropriateness in the HD1 Zone and its potential impact on neighboring residential areas.

Another discussion involved the Gateway Industrial 175 LLC’s application for a use variance to construct a warehouse with associated office spaces. The property lacked formal approval history, prompting the applicant to offer a condition for creating a separate parcel for the parking lot. Additionally, the applicant proposed extending a water line to the property, benefitting several properties along the route. Concerns about adequate water pressure for firefighting were addressed, with assurances that New Jersey American Water would ensure sufficient pressure. The applicant also expressed a desire to amend the sanitary sewer service plan, aiming to connect to the existing sewer infrastructure, although current regulations posed challenges.

01:11:35The board’s attention then shifted to a property subdivision proposal associated with a warehouse building. The applicant sought to remove a “flag” portion of the lot, maintaining access through an easement. Discussions revealed that the proposal necessitated a D1 variance due to the accessory use without a principal use on the lot. The board emphasized zoning compliance, including the ten-acre maximum for certain uses and the need for a 50-foot perimeter buffer. The lack of submitted documentation led to frustration, prompting a break for the applicant to reassess. Upon returning, the applicant agreed to renotice and republish the application to include necessary additional relief, with the board setting a future meeting date for further discussion.