The most discussion centered around the proposal for pedestrian-activated crosswalks along US1. A representative from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) outlined plans to install up to three crosswalks in high-traffic areas, including near hotels, restaurants, and Founders Park. This proposal was prompted by a citizen request and aimed to address pedestrian safety concerns in the area. However, the council and community members expressed skepticism about the necessity and potential impact of these crosswalks.

The sheriff highlighted that recent data showed no significant pedestrian-related incidents at the proposed locations, arguing that crosswalk installations could exacerbate traffic issues and create a false sense of security for pedestrians. Similar experiences in Key West were cited, where crosswalks reportedly led to an increase in vehicle-pedestrian incidents. The council raised questions about the study that initiated the proposal, emphasizing the importance of data-driven decisions. Concerns about the impact on traffic flow and the possibility of increased congestion were prominent in the discussions.

Meanwhile, the council also grappled with the broader issue of residential development and its impact on the village’s infrastructure. Public commentary revealed significant apprehension about the implications of increased building allocations. Residents and representatives from various organizations, including the Island of Key Largo Federation of Homeowner Associations and Last Stand, urged the council to pause any decisions on additional building allocations until a thorough evaluation of the effects on public safety, infrastructure, and the environment was conducted.

Concerns were raised about the capacity of existing infrastructure to handle further growth, citing failing levels of service on U.S. 1 due to worsening traffic congestion and issues with the sewer system. The Rate of Growth Ordinance (ROGO) was highlighted as a important tool for managing development pace and protecting sensitive environmental areas and resident safety, particularly during hurricane evacuations.

The council’s discussions on building allocations were further complicated by procedural debates. A resolution to recommend additional residential building permit allocations to the Monroe County Board of County Commissioners faced opposition from residents who feared increased density would strain infrastructure and degrade the environment. Public comments emphasized the need for affordable housing rather than high-end development, reflecting broader concerns about the region’s sustainability and residents’ quality of life.

In the backdrop of these debates, the council also addressed logistical and procedural matters, including the approval of grant applications and updates to public comment procedures. A resolution was introduced to align the council’s meeting procedures with recent changes in public comment laws, prompting discussions about the balance between maintaining order and encouraging public engagement.

The meeting concluded with the council acknowledging the challenges of balancing development with infrastructure limitations and community needs.