At the forefront of the meeting was the presentation of an ambitious master plan for Founders Park, introduced by Jack Cartis, a senior recreation planner, and landscape architect Lumi Fuentes. The plan, which emerged after extensive public engagement involving over 860 surveys, aims to enhance the park with improved facilities and infrastructure while respecting its natural beauty. The proposal outlines several phases of development, including enhanced entrances, expanded recreational facilities, and environmental preservation efforts. Key upgrades include the construction of a covered gymnasium, additional pickleball courts, sand volleyball courts, and expanded parking to accommodate increased usage.

The financial aspect of the master plan was a point of discussion, with estimated costs projected to reach approximately $22 million over 15 years. The council deliberated on funding strategies, emphasizing the need for a plan to secure grants and other financial opportunities. Concerns about the environmental impact of the development, particularly regarding the preservation of the tropical hardwood hammock area, were raised, highlighting the necessity of balancing community desires with ecological considerations.

Council members acknowledged the potential benefits of the park’s development but expressed reservations about the feasibility of funding such an extensive project.

In addition to the park master plan, the council addressed ongoing infrastructure projects, including a critical water transmission project led by Aaron Cutler from the Florida Keys Aquatic Authority. The project, which involves the installation of over 2,000 feet of new steel transmission drinking water pipe, has necessitated careful coordination with local law enforcement and schools to manage traffic impacts. The council reviewed traffic management strategies and timelines, considering upcoming events such as Fantasy Fest and local boat races that could affect construction schedules.

The council also engaged in a debate over extending a lobbying contract with the Southern Group. Several members voiced concerns about the firm’s past performance and potential conflicts of interest, while others emphasized the need for improved communication and strategic legislative advocacy.

A contentious property appeal regarding dwelling unit determinations for lots along Overseas Highway was another focal point. The council deliberated on the historical use of the properties and the number of legally established units, with conflicting evidence leading to a complex discussion about zoning regulations and property rights. The appeal process illustrated the challenges of reconciling historical property usage with current zoning codes and the implications for local development.