Islamorada Council Tackles Affordable Housing and Code Changes

The Islamorada Village Council meeting focused on issues surrounding affordable housing allocations, potential code changes, and the role of the council in development review procedures. A debate ensued over the interpretation of zoning codes and the eligibility of a property fronting on US1 for affordable housing, which raised broader concerns about the council’s involvement in overriding planning department decisions and the need for clearer regulatory language.

The most contentious topic of the meeting was the discussion surrounding a property’s eligibility for affordable housing allocations due to its frontage on US1. The property owner, facing scrutiny and denial, expressed frustration with the contradictory responses received regarding the classification of their property as a single-family or duplex. The council debated the interpretation of “fronting” in the village code, with opinions divided on whether the property in question met the criteria for affordable housing. Some council members and public commenters questioned the property’s density and the validity of the application process, while others called for further clarification on the term “fronting” from the village attorney.

Amid the debate, the broader issue of potential loopholes in the village code and the desire for a decision specific to the property were highlighted, pointing to the need for a separate determination for properties along US1. This discussion led to considerations about formalizing language within the code to address inconsistencies related to frontage and affordable housing allocation.

The council also discussed potential code changes related to development review procedures. Differing perspectives emerged on the council’s role in this process. One council member expressed reservations about the council acting as an intermediary between the planning department and disgruntled developers or homeowners. This member suggested that the council should revisit the proposal after tightening the comprehensive plan and reviewing the codes. Conversely, another council member supported the proposed code change, arguing that it could prevent litigation and save the village money by offering developers an extra step to challenge imposed conditions.


Ultimately, the council voted to move forward with the proposed code change, with the dissenting council member voting against it. The decision underscored the ongoing tension between the desire to streamline development processes and the need to maintain rigorous standards that protect the village’s interests.

Another topic of discussion was the council’s annual review of the Local Planning Agency (LPA) members. Questions were raised about the terms and appointments of the LPA members. Moreover, the Chair of the LPA provided a report on the LPA’s January and March meetings, which included changes in zoning and flume status for several properties.

Public comments touched on various subjects, including the cost and tax implications of keeping an interim manager/advisor for another month. A member of the community raised concerns about the previous management position of a certain Mr. Yates, referencing a 3-2 vote to not continue his role and discussing 27 emails in support of him, questioning the bias of the decision.


The meeting also covered the approval of residential building permit allocation rankings and awards for the fourth quarter of 2023. The Planning Director presented the details of the affordable residential building permit allocations, including the available allocations for 2023, evaluation of applications, and the scoring and ranking process. Discussion included the reduction in available allocations and the evaluation criteria outlined in the village code.

A proposed construction project requiring two affordable housing allocations brought forth another layer of complexity. Here, the Mayor abstained from voting due to a conflict of interest but participated in the discussion. Concerns were voiced about setting a precedent for properties fronting on US1 and the need for clarity in the village’s affordable housing policies.

Finally, the council addressed administrative matters, including the need to address issues with advertising and regulations. An administrative appeal regarding the construction of a tiki hut within the required setback led to a continuance approval, further extending the time for resolution and tolling the running of fines through code enforcement.


Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Joseph “Buddy” Pinder III
City Council Officials:
Sharon Mahoney, Mark Gregg, Elizabeth Jolin, Henry Rosenthal

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country:

Meeting Date
Filter by bodytypes
Agricultural Advisory Committee
Airport Advisory Board
Art and Culture Board
Beach Committee
Bike and Pedestrian Advisory Committee
Board of Elections
Board of Health
Borough Council
Building Committee
Cannabis Control Board
Cemetery Commission
Charter Revision Commission
Child and Family Services Board
City Council
City Identity Committee
Code Enforcement Board
College Board of Trustees
Community Appearance Board
Community Preservation Committee
Community Redevelopment Agency
County Council
Disability Advisory Committee
Economic Development Board
Elderly Affairs Board
Electric Advisory Board
Environmental Commission
Financial Oversight Board
Historic Preservation Commission
Housing Authority
Human Relations Committee
Insurance Fund
Land Use Board
Library Board
Licensing Board
Mental Health Commission
Municipal Alliance
Open Space Commission
Oversight and Review Committee
Parking Authority
Parks and Gardens Commission
Parks Commission
Pension Board
Planning Board
Planning Board,Zoning Board
Police Review Board
Property Assessment Board
Public Safety Committee
Recreation Commission
Redevelopment Agency
Rent Leveling Board
School Board
Sewerage Authority
Shade Tree Commission
Special Magistrate
Taxation & Revenue Advisory Committee
Tourism Board
Trails Committee
Transportation Board
Utility Board
Value Adjustment Board
Veterans Committee
Water Control Board
Women's Advisory Committee
Youth Advisory Committee
Zoning Board
Filter by County
Bay County
Bradford County
Brevard County
Broward County
Clay County
Duval County
Escambia County
Gulf County
Highlands County
Hillsborough County
Indian River County
Lake County
Lee County
Leon County
Levy County
Liberty County
Manatee County
Marion County
Martin County
Miami-Dade County
Monroe County
Okaloosa County
Orange County
Osceola County
Palm Beach County
Pasco County
Pinellas County
Polk County
Putnam County
Santa Rosa County
Sarasota County
Seminole County
St. Johns County
Taylor County
Volusia County
Walton County
Barnstable County
Berkshire County
Bristol County
Essex County
Franklin County
Hampden County
Hampshire County
Middlesex County
Norfolk County
Plymouth County
Suffolk County
Worcester County
Atlantic County
Bergen County
Burlington County
Camden County
Cape May County
Cumberland County
Essex County
Gloucester County
Hudson County
Hunterdon County
Mercer County
Middlesex County
Monmouth County
Morris County
Ocean County
Passaic County
Somerset County
Sussex County
Union County
Warren County
Filter by sourcetypes