- Filters
- MN
- Chisago County
- 8/20/24
- 08/20/2024
- 23 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Wyoming City Council on August 20, 2024, approved a $1.5 million contract for the 2024 Street Improvement project and discussed several topics including a purchase of new radios for the fire department and a Moody’s credit rating upgrade for the city.
- NJ
- Morris County
- 8/20/24
- 08/20/2024
- 156 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Dover School Board meeting on [specific date] focused on the expansion of language programs and extensive mental health supports within the district, alongside discussions on student enrollment trends and administrative updates.
- NJ
- Bergen County
- 8/19/24
- 08/21/2024
- 101 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: During the recent Old Tappan Borough Council meeting, residents expressed concerns about the new tree removal regulations. The primary issue arose during the public comments segment, where a new property owner, Martino, outlined the financial and procedural challenges posed by these rules. He detailed his experience with the permit process, which required him to plant 57 new trees or make a substantial donation to the town, totaling $7,375, for the removal of 19 trees. Martino noted that some of the trees were hazardous, presenting a danger to his family and property.
- NJ
- Hunterdon County
- 8/19/24
- 08/20/2024
- 156 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Hunterdon Central School Board meeting on August 19, 2024, covered topics including the appointment of a new superintendent, analysis of student performance, and concerns regarding student transportation safety.
- FL
- Seminole County
- 8/19/24
- 08/19/2024
- 106 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Oviedo City Council meeting on August 19, 2024, focused on the adoption of a new Mobility fee, modifications to the Transportation concurrency requirements, and the implications for development within the city. Key discussions included the impact on property owners, public feedback on the new fee structure, and amendments to existing ordinances.