- Filters
- NJ
- Hudson County
- 5/19/25
- 05/20/2025
- 70 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jersey City Council meeting on May 19, 2025, addressed issues affecting the community, with a primary focus on public safety and infrastructure projects. The Council decided to pause the controversial Barrow Street playground project, highlighting concerns over safety, business accessibility, and effective urban planning.
- NJ
- Hudson County
- 5/19/25
- 05/21/2025
- 189 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jersey City Historic Preservation Commission meeting on May 19th, 2025, primarily focused on the proposal regarding the Garfield Avenue substation. Other topics addressed included various residential renovation projects within historic districts, reflecting ongoing efforts to balance architectural integrity with contemporary living requirements.
- NJ
- Somerset County
- 5/19/25
- 08/11/2025
- 199 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Bernards Township Planning Board meeting focused on two primary topics: the proposal by the Islamic Society of Basking Ridge (ISBR) to build a mosque on Church Street and the township’s obligations regarding affordable housing.
- MA
- Hampden County
- 5/19/25
- 05/20/2025
- 88 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Southwick Conservation Commission meeting on May 19th focused on several issues, including the rapid spread of the invasive plant knotweed and accessibility challenges at King’s Beach. The meeting, conducted in a hybrid format, saw full attendance from commission members and covered topics ranging from project approvals under the Massachusetts Wetland Act to updates on conservation property management.
- NJ
- Ocean County
- 5/19/25
- 05/19/2025
- 101 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Jackson Planning Board meeting on May 19th focused on the Jackson 21 development’s deck size regulations and pressing affordable housing timelines. The board debated the potential impact of allowing homeowners to exceed current deck size limitations without needing board approval, provided zoning laws were respected.