- Filters
- MN
- Rice County
- 11/17/25
- 11/17/2025
- 11 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Faribault Planning Commission meeting focused on the approval of the final plat for Jazzy First Edition and the delay of a decision regarding Mighty Fine Coffee’s application due to incomplete submissions. The commission also briefly covered the progress of the Ivy Hill project.
- VA
- Albemarle County
- 11/17/25
- 11/17/2025
- 205 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The recent Charlottesville City Council meeting was marked by community backlash against the proposed LV Collective luxury student housing project. Concerned residents and community leaders expressed their worries about how the project might prioritize profits over the needs of existing neighborhoods.
- MN
- Washington County
- 11/17/25
- 11/17/2025
- 54 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Bayport Planning Commission has approved a conditional use permit for My Dealer LLC to establish a retail cannabis dispensary at 243rd Street North. The decision came after discussions during the recent meeting, addressing concerns related to zoning compliance, security measures, and the potential impact on the community.
- TX
- Tarrant County
- 11/15/25
- 11/15/2025
- 58 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: In a recent meeting, the Fort Worth City Council discussed two topics: the 2050 comprehensive plan and the proposed $840 million bond program for the upcoming 2026 election. The bond program, aimed at addressing infrastructure needs without increasing the tax rate, presents a strategic allocation of funds across various sectors such as streets, mobility, parks, public safety, and affordable housing.
- MA
- Norfolk County
- 11/14/25
- 11/16/2025
- 70 Minutes
- Noteworthy
- Highly Noteworthy
- Routine
Overview: The Brookline Select Board meeting on November 14, 2025, was marked by discussions on a proposed warrant article aimed at regulating outdoor lighting, highlighting concerns over enforcement capabilities, legal uncertainties, and public engagement. The proposal, which seeks to address nuisance lighting and light pollution, has sparked debate about its implications for residents and town resources.